BSV Forum - General - The Bloodshedpub

Which Shippers Are More Outspoken.

Feb 13 2008 12:02 am   #1Guest
I was on another sight and the ever present arguement of Bangel vs. Spuffy. The girl who asked the question was asking about polls, since in one Spuffy won and another Bangel won. She was a Bangel and she said that she thinks there are more Buffy/Angel fans but the Spuffy's are more outspoken because they want to prove that Buffy loved him.

What do you think?
Feb 13 2008 12:16 am   #2TammyDevil666
I'm not sure, but I think there are a lot more Spuffy fans.  I've never seen any fan fiction sites that are just dedicated to Bangel, but then again, I never really look.
When I say, "I love you," it's not because I want you or because I can't have you. It has nothing to do with me. I love what you are, what you do, how you try. I've seen your kindness and your strength. I've seen the best and the worst of you, and I understand with perfect clarity exactly what you are. You're a hell of a woman. You're the one, Buffy.
Feb 13 2008 12:22 am   #3slaymesoftly
Yeah, I tend to think there are more of us - but then I've never gone looking for Bangel sites, so what do I know?
I am not a minion of Evil...
I am upper management.
Feb 13 2008 12:52 am   #4Eowyn315
She was a Bangel and she said that she thinks there are more Buffy/Angel fans but the Spuffy's are more outspoken because they want to prove that Buffy loved him.

Actually, the exact opposite is true. There are definitely way more Spuffy fans, judging by the comparative numbers of fanfic sites. I don't know what they are, offhand, but someone just posted it in another thread. And the Bangel fans are way more intent on "proving" that Angel is Buffy's soulmate, or one true love, or whatever you want to call it. They get waaaay more riled up about it being canon than Spuffy fans - Spuffies seem to accept that canon is what it is, and it ended kind of ambiguously, whereas Bangels seem to be more insistent that it be canon that Buffy and Angel loved each other to their dying day.
Writing should feel easy, like a monkey driving a speed boat.
Feb 13 2008 01:19 am   #5Immortal Beloved
Buffy and Angel loved each other to their dying day.

That just sounds so delusional to me :-P

I've never gone looking for Bangel sites.  Although, I'd tend to believe that there are more Spuffy sites than Bangel sites, as when I first started looking for archives, etc., I was just searching for BtVS and found hoards of Spuffy.  I'd look into it more, but the thought of Bangle makes me wanna hurl :hurl:
Give me Spuffy, or give me death.
Feb 13 2008 01:34 am   #6nmcil
Know this is silly fun stuff, but you can cast your vote if you want: 

Quetion for poll:  Who should Buffy Choose as her mate, lover, companion?

http://www.youchoose.net/campaign/who_should_buffy_choose
” Recent evolutionary models have demonstrated what politicians have long known: the best way to get people to collaborate and to think like a group is to identify an enemy and charge that “they” threaten “us.”

Michael Tomasello is co-director of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.
Feb 13 2008 01:57 am   #7Scarlet Ibis
I am certain that the Bangels are a dying breed.  Honestly, they were just not a fun couple.  Rewatching s1-3, almost all of their moments on screen together (alone) kinda make me want to cringe.  They just work so much better not together.  There was no...color or pizazz with them.  It was always dour and sour.  What else can you say about those two that hasn't already been said in canon?  What could you possibly change besides making Angel a real boy?  What are Bangels even discussing and writing about besides "Buffy & Angel 4 eva!"?  I'm not upset or anything (because writing here has about as much emotion as a stone tablet), but I really don't get it.  If I had to write a Bangel fan fic, I'd seriously feel like I was trapped in a dark, dank corner.  Canon exercised all of their potential together, IMHO.  They have no real breathing room. Excluding AH fics, of course.
"Just when the caterpillar thought the world was over, it became a butterfly."
https://www.facebook.com/FangirlNovel
Feb 13 2008 02:06 am   #8Nika
I think that's what most of Bangel fics are. AH. Spuffy has it's share of them as well, but most are good, Spike stays a vampire and Buffy a slayer and I rarely find two alike.

As for polls, well, yes Bangel does tend to outrank Spuffy a bit. But I think that's because Spuffy's are more content. But then again I'm not a Bangel, maybe they see it differently.
"Perhaps a great love is never returned."

-Dag Hammersjold
Feb 13 2008 02:21 am   #9Eowyn315
I haven't looked for Bangel fic, either, but I would guess that a lot of it is either FITB from seasons 1-3 or post-series Buffy/Angel reunions. Some of them may be with a Shanshued Angel, but I'm sure there's souled-vamp Angel fics, too. Delusional as it may seem, "true love forever" was pretty much the theme of their relationship - it was the great, epic (ultimately tragic) romance. And it only works if they love each other forever. If they move on, then the relationship loses its grandeur and mysticism and Angel becomes just another boyfriend for Buffy instead of the great love she professed him to be when they were together.
Writing should feel easy, like a monkey driving a speed boat.
Feb 13 2008 02:53 am   #10Nika
I once read about a Bangel fic where Buffy and Angel try to prove their love for one another by giving the souled Spike the amulet knowing it would kill him. That doesn't raise my faith in Bangel very much.

Most of their arguements against Spuffy seem to be the attempted rape, him sleeping with Anya, or saying that Spike didn't change. They blame Spike for sleeping with Anya, but don't blame Angel for sleeping with Darla and Nina? Or falling in love with Cordelia. Just doesn't make sense to me.

Question, for Bangels it seems like they need Buffy and Angel to be 'forever in love'. Do you need Buffy to love Spike to ship Spuffy? I wonder if some of the Bangels would still be Bangels if Angel had ever attempted to rape Buffy, or if Buffy had ever beat him and left him to die.
"Perhaps a great love is never returned."

-Dag Hammersjold
Feb 13 2008 04:15 am   #11Scarlet Ibis
Do you need Buffy to love Spike to ship Spuffy?

I would think no, since I've heard people say before that they just want who Spike wants.  But for me personally, I'd say no.  Canon wise, she didn't love him as much or as long as she loved Angel, and I don't care.  Also, I wasn't waiting on the edge of my seat Angel s5 for Buffy to show up, and profess her love to one or the other.  I think part of the problem is that some (cause it's not like I took a poll or nothin :P ) really despise Spike, and Spuffies, well, I wouldn't say that a good number of them hate Angel.  Some do, but I'd be hard pressed to say most (as I would with Bangels in regards to Spike).  At any rate, I like Angel--when he's away from Buffy, funny enough.  Especially when he doesn't fear his anger or his strength, and doesn't mind admitting that yes, Angelus is apart of him (when we first see Gunn, Angel threatens the vamp gang who killed his sister, and when the leader asks for his name, he says "Angelus," and stakes the guy, followed by "I wasn't talking to you."  It was just really cool).
"Just when the caterpillar thought the world was over, it became a butterfly."
https://www.facebook.com/FangirlNovel
Feb 13 2008 05:39 am   #12Eowyn315
Do you need Buffy to love Spike to ship Spuffy?

Well... depends what you mean. In canon? No, not really. But in the stories I read and write? Yeah, for the most part, they're gonna end up together, so I want her to love him. That doesn't rule out the occasional dark story where one of them kills the other one, or a FITB season 6 fic when Buffy's just using Spike, or something along those lines, but for the most part, yeah, I want Buffy to at least end up loving Spike, even if she doesn't start out that way in the fic.
Writing should feel easy, like a monkey driving a speed boat.
Feb 13 2008 08:18 am   #13nmcil
I'm a total Spuffy Lover - I just love these two characters and their relationship - Of course, any really fine story with another couple is great for Buffy Fan Fiction genre, and there are many out there - But for me, I love having them end up together.  I have enjoyed several where there are other people involved but eventually they come together.   I also really enjoy Spike-Tara friendship stories very much.  Wish they were more of them - and how I wish people would take up Lorne more in the fan fiction community - I think he is such an interesting character and has so much potential, yet he is not used much.  Wish someone would start a series with Spike, Lorne and Wesley as partner in new detective agency maybe even with Dawn & Andrew as part of the team.
” Recent evolutionary models have demonstrated what politicians have long known: the best way to get people to collaborate and to think like a group is to identify an enemy and charge that “they” threaten “us.”

Michael Tomasello is co-director of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.
Feb 13 2008 03:27 pm   #14Enisy
Actually, the exact opposite is true. There are definitely way more Spuffy fans, judging by the comparative numbers of fanfic sites. I don't know what they are, offhand, but someone just posted it in another thread.

I think that was me. Here's the stats:

LiveJournal
56 communities and 183 users are interested in "Bangel"
203 communities and 471 users are interested in "Spuffy"

Fanfiction.Net
Picking "Buffy" and "Angel" as main characters from the drop-down menu gives 109 pages of results
Picking "Buffy" and "Spike" as main characters from the drop-down menu gives 220 pages of results
Searching for "Angel Buffy" in the "Buffy: The Vampire Slayer" category gives 2,987 results
Searching for "Spike Buffy" in the "Buffy: The Vampire Slayer" category gives 4,944 results

(Can't try it on search engines, because "Buffy" and "Angel" usually give results about the shows Buffy: The Vampire Slayer and Angel: the Series rather than the characters Buffy and Angel.)

Feb 13 2008 03:45 pm   #15Guest
I was back on the sight and a few Bangel shippers were saying that they don't believe in Spuffy because they don't believe Spike loved Buffy.
Feb 13 2008 03:54 pm   #16Enisy
Yeah, I was debating with a few of them recently. It's such an absurd claim to make. Spike-->Buffy is the epitome of selfless love in the 'verse.

Gotta add:

LiveJournal
46 communities and 158 users are interested in "Angel/Buffy"
80 communities and 455 users are interested in "Spike/Buffy"


Feb 13 2008 04:04 pm   #17Guest
I was doing it today but I decided to back out of it before I tear my hair out in frustration. Some of them seem to be living in their own little world.

They blame Spike for everything but when Angel does something similar it's passed over. It's a double standard. They blame Spike for sleeping with Anya, but I asked if they blamed Angel for sleeping with Darla they said no because he has the right to move on. Doesn't Spike? I guess not, they don't like him being in love with Buffy but when he tries to move on they blame him for it? Makes no sense.

But I think no matter what Spuffy's and even non Spuffy's who just hate Angel say, they would never accept it.
Feb 13 2008 04:05 pm   #18Guest
Sorry, didn't mean to type in Angel I meant to type in Bangel.
Feb 13 2008 11:28 pm   #19EMM
I was on IMDB about a year ago and they were playing that elimate game. After dozens of pages I saw that Spuffy outnumbered Bangel about 5 to 1.

Feb 14 2008 03:06 am   #20Immortal Beloved
Do you need Buffy to love Spike to ship Spuffy?

Do I need Buffy to love Spike?  No.  I do believe that she does, though.  I have no idea what it is about the Spuffy relationship that just sucks me in and doesn't let go.  It's funny, 'cause if it were a relationship in RL, there are certain aspects of it that would have me urging the parties to part.  But, it's not RL, so I can have my fantasy :-)

I wish people would take up Lorne more in the fan fiction community

I freaking love Lorne.  He rocks :-D  My favorite AtS character.

they don't believe Spike loved Buffy.

To that I say a big, "HUH?"  Can totally see how someone would say that Buffy doesn't love Spike, but Spike not loving Buffy.  These people must be crazy.  Wait--they're Bangles.  That's explains it, I guess :-P

Give me Spuffy, or give me death.
Feb 14 2008 04:59 am   #21LindsayH
They blame Spike for everything but when Angel does something similar it's passed over. It's a double standard. They blame Spike for sleeping with Anya, but I asked if they blamed Angel for sleeping with Darla they said no because he has the right to move on. Doesn't Spike? I guess not, they don't like him being in love with Buffy but when he tries to move on they blame him for it? Makes no sense.

Bangel fans think like Buffy, but Spuffy fans think like Spike.  I mean, from what I've read, Bangel fans buy into the same kind of denial and doublethink that are Buffy's trademarks.  Not meaning to be unkind, because I think those qualities are what make Buffy such an interesting character.

As to the combining characters-fics, I really love those fics where both gangs converge.  There are some characters on both shows that I would have loved to have seen them meet. 

"Do you like my mask?  Isn't it pretty?  It raises the dead!"--Giles, "Dead Man's Party'
Feb 14 2008 05:04 am   #22Scarlet Ibis
Bangel fans think like Buffy, but Spuffy fans think like Spike.

Wow...I never thought of it that way, but...No truer words were spoken :P
"Just when the caterpillar thought the world was over, it became a butterfly."
https://www.facebook.com/FangirlNovel
Feb 14 2008 05:30 am   #23Nika
I never thought of it like that before, but now that you've mentioned it, it's makes a lot of sense, doesn't it?
"Perhaps a great love is never returned."

-Dag Hammersjold
Feb 16 2008 04:50 am   #24Darth Rosenberg
I'm reading the YouChoose "should Buffy choose Angel or Spike" comments, and wow, Bangels really don't have much to go on except for the whole 'first love' bull. Us Spuffies, on the other hand, have a lot more to go on. And a lot more that means more, because, quality, not quantity.

Oh, and I commented too. :D
Feb 16 2008 05:21 am   #25TammyDevil666
Bangel fans really just live in their own little delusional world, like anyone really ends up with their first love these days.
When I say, "I love you," it's not because I want you or because I can't have you. It has nothing to do with me. I love what you are, what you do, how you try. I've seen your kindness and your strength. I've seen the best and the worst of you, and I understand with perfect clarity exactly what you are. You're a hell of a woman. You're the one, Buffy.
Feb 16 2008 05:34 am   #26Scarlet Ibis
I don't understand...did they just stop watching the series after s3, and not bother to even take a glance at Angel's show?  Angel clearly loved Cordelia more than he ever loved Buffy, and Spike clearly loved Buffy more than Angel could even comprehend.  It's totally okay to strike out the first time...retaining all of that old baggage can't be good for your insides.
"Just when the caterpillar thought the world was over, it became a butterfly."
https://www.facebook.com/FangirlNovel
Feb 16 2008 05:42 am   #27TammyDevil666
A lot of people did actually stop watching after Angel left, as for not watching his show, I don't really know.  The whole thing seems a bit ridiculous, though.  I may have been a Bangel fan the first three years, but I wasn't about to stop watching, I loved the show too much.
When I say, "I love you," it's not because I want you or because I can't have you. It has nothing to do with me. I love what you are, what you do, how you try. I've seen your kindness and your strength. I've seen the best and the worst of you, and I understand with perfect clarity exactly what you are. You're a hell of a woman. You're the one, Buffy.
Feb 16 2008 05:57 am   #28Scarlet Ibis
If they just stopped watching...I've got to wonder now why they even care?  That makes it even more odd, IMHO.
"Just when the caterpillar thought the world was over, it became a butterfly."
https://www.facebook.com/FangirlNovel
Feb 16 2008 04:59 pm   #29slaymesoftly
I find it very strange - for all of the reasons listed above.  Watching the dvds in sequence, I can find myself right there with Buffy for the first three seasons - then her life goes on. I even rooted for Riley for a little while, because she seemed to care about him.  But, just as Buffy's life changed and the men in it became more...interesting...(lol), so did my idea of who she should be with.  Spike pretty much had me at "Oh, God, no!"  LOL
I am not a minion of Evil...
I am upper management.
Feb 16 2008 05:59 pm   #30SpikeHot
I think it depends, if the show went on after season seven, and Buffy found someone else that connects with her other than Spike (maybe even better than Spike), would Spike/Buffy fans keep watching?

I know many who didn't bother with the season eight comics, not because it was continued in comic books, but because Spike isn't there, and they fear that Buffy would end up with Xander or someone else.
Feb 16 2008 06:34 pm   #31Scarlet Ibis
I'm not hung up on (canon) Spuffy.  I'm pretty much fine with Spike being on Angel.  If Buffy were to end up with Xander...I'd be okay with it.  As long as they weren't just thrust together randomly, and there was an actual change.  I mean he and Willow saw each other in a different light once upon a time, so I suppose it isn't that outlandish (though really, he and Dawn would make more sense, once she's normal sized again IMHO).
"Just when the caterpillar thought the world was over, it became a butterfly."
https://www.facebook.com/FangirlNovel
Feb 16 2008 07:41 pm   #32Eowyn315
Yeah, I've noticed that, SpikeHot. It seems a tad hypocritical that so many Spuffy fans look down on Bangel fans for clinging to a pairing that's in the past, when they themselves refuse to read or accept the comics as canon solely because Spike isn't in them and there's no chance for a Spuffy reunion.
Writing should feel easy, like a monkey driving a speed boat.
Feb 16 2008 08:33 pm   #33Sotia
Well, Eowyn, it was Angel's choice to break up with her, while Spike was torn away and though initially chose not to contact her (after a little nudge that way by the broody one, but still his choice, I know) now he doesn't have the ability to go back to her. So Bangels are clinging on something that isn't because the feelings aren't there, while we're still cursing the fates (and Joss! Although at least he said that Buffy loved Spike when she told him so.)

Hence I see the Spuffy clinging as different than the Bangel one, but then it could be that I'm biased... :P

xxx
What can I tell you, baby? I've always been bad...
Feb 17 2008 12:59 am   #34FetchingMadScientist
Here's the thing...we, as Spuffies, know that our ship isn't canon, because what we got, on the one hand, was abusive and on the other, too little too late.  For me, that's fine.  I have my fanfic.  If the 'ship that I 'm fond of isn't canon, then why read it, and obsess about who Buff'y's *not * with?

I don't need it to be canon.  Would it be nice if it were?  Sure.  But, I'm not losing sleep.  I've got my fanfic.  I write.  I know what it is that I want to see, and I'm making it happen.
"Never a fetching mad scientist about when you need one." -Spike
Feb 17 2008 01:19 am   #35Eowyn315
initially chose not to contact her (after a little nudge that way by the broody one, but still his choice, I know) now he doesn't have the ability to go back to her.

Technically, Angel doesn't have the ability to go back to her, either. They're both stuck in hell. But before that, you said it yourself - Spike had plenty of opportunities to go back to Buffy, and he didn't. So, if Buffy moves on to someone else in the comics, is it really any different?

If certain Spuffy fans aren't even giving the comics a chance solely because Spike's not in them, isn't that exactly the same as the Bangel fans who stopped watching after season 3? The people who criticize Bangel fans for their "true love forever" ideal are essentially trumpeting the same philosophy when they refuse to see Buffy with anyone else after Spike.
Writing should feel easy, like a monkey driving a speed boat.
Feb 17 2008 01:31 am   #36nmcil
I don't need it to be canon. Would it be nice if it were? Sure. But, I'm not losing sleep. I've got my fanfic. I write. I know what it is that I want to see, and I'm making it happen.

This is why I love reading Spuffy, the writers can explore this relationship in so many ways - everything from light comedies to the deepest emotional levels - the writers can work with what was presented on the series or take us to completely different Buffyverse - Spuffyverse realms.  For the writers and readers that like to continue exploration of the series, they can question everything that happened and bring new insights into the series.  I also love to read the time travel exploits, which was something that I always hoped would be part of the series if they had a spin-off. 

As far as the Bangel contrast to Spuffy - doing these episode discussions and going back to watch the earlier season once again, I am more than ever very uncomfortable with the Buffy-Angel relationship, aside from the mythic  perspective applied to this relationship, and it is a magnificent perspective, there is very little in their relationship that, IMO, was a good thing for this young female character.  Buffy and Angel made a splendid romantic tale of lovers in chaos, but the almost destroyed their heroine in the process.  I would certainly understand if a great many people who did not follow the series from beginning to end would not think it was buffy who had their inner demons made flesh.  Unless you knew her beginning story or paid very close attention to all the visuals, mythic symbolism, and other literary and pop culture references, you could very easily grow to dislike Buffy, and dislike her very much indeed.
” Recent evolutionary models have demonstrated what politicians have long known: the best way to get people to collaborate and to think like a group is to identify an enemy and charge that “they” threaten “us.”

Michael Tomasello is co-director of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.
Feb 17 2008 11:19 pm   #37Immortal Beloved
Personally, I don't care if Spuffy is canon or not.  I do read the Season 8 comics and the Season 6 comics, mostly because I'm a canon freak.  It's one of my quirks: must know everything there is to know about canon.  I'm weird that way. 

BUT I'll also ship Spuffy 'till my dying day.  I think part of it is because I know that RL logistics is part of the reason why they aren't together in canon.  The AtS Powers that Decide What's Produced for Television wanted Spike on AtS, so Spike didn't go to Buffy when he was corporeal.  When he did try to find her, she wasn't in Rome, not only because she has decoys, but because Sarah Michelle Gellar was filming the Grudge :-P At least, I think that was her scheduling conflict at the time.

I also know that Joss most likely wouldn't let them be together forever because that would piss off the Bangels, does not make for good drama, and may not be how he pictures the characters' lives.  However, who the hell says Joss knows what he's talking about?  I know, blasphemy; but, as far as I know, no one has dubbed him Joss Whedon, universal decider of who loves whom.  From my viewpoint, he couldn't possibly create two characters who would be more right for eachother.  Spike loves Buffy unconditionally, and whether or not she deserves it, Buffy needs unconditional love.  If Joss wants Buffy to end up with Xander... :hurl:  Sorry, just threw up in my mouth a little bit.... If Joss wants Buffy to end up with Xander to prove that the dork can get the girl or whatever cockamamy reason he can cook up, then let him.  It's his story to tell; he can do whatever he wants.  But that doesn't mean that I--or anyone else--has to jump on board the Bander train.  Thank god you Spuffy writers know better ;-)

Vive le Spuffy!
Give me Spuffy, or give me death.
Feb 17 2008 11:42 pm   #38Guest
I heard in an interview that in Chosen Angel was brought in because it was the completion of the series. It was supposed to be going back to the beginning and allowing hope for the Bangels because the writers thought that Buffy and Angel forever was what the audience wanted. We also are told that Angel was originally supposed to tell Buffy about Connor and Cordelia and kind of hash out how they've both grown and become different people but will still always be there for each other, but there wasn't time or it wouldn't work with the story. It just felt like the writers kept making mistakes towards the end there trying to cover themselves from the disaster that was Season Sex. Unrealistic, out of character, illogical, and brutal and not what the audience cared about. No wonder we need to take comfort in our own worlds of fanfic where Spuffy is possible. Plus how irritating it was to see Spike represented in AtS. They just glossed over the Angelus-Angel soul issue compared to the Spike soul issue besides one sentence in the eppie Destiny.
Feb 18 2008 12:01 am   #39Enisy
I love Season 6 -- if anything, it was more realistic than any other season, since it cut down on the metaphors in order to  show that, as you grow up, "life suddenly isn't this great battle, it's this tiny, mundane, very real thing" (Joss Whedon).

Angel/Buffy got that scene in Chosen because Joss felt he had to "do service" to the faction of the fandom that 'shipped them. Same reason he did that threesome fantasy in The Long Way Home, same reason he's bound to give us a Spike/Buffy reunion someday.

Feb 18 2008 12:26 am   #40Nika
The reason I don't like the Angel/Buffy reunion in Chosen, is because not only was it very out of character for both, but it felt like the writer's were chickening out of Spuffy. Never before after they had broken up, with the exception of I Will Remember You, had they greeted with a kiss. And especially not when Spike was in Buffy's heart, doesn't matter if she was or wasn't in love with him, and Angel being in love with Cordelia.

I don't get why Joss felt he had to do service to the Bangels. They would have kept on shipping Bangel, and it's not like they weren't already outraged enough because Spike got the I love you. I don't see him bringing back Oz for a Willow/Oz reunion and there is a lot of the fandom that still ships them, so why do that with Buffy and Angel?
"Perhaps a great love is never returned."

-Dag Hammersjold
Feb 18 2008 12:57 am   #41Enisy
They wanted to bring back Oz for the finale, actually, but they couldn't afford Seth Green.

I think he just wanted to give something to both of the two main 'ships, since the show was ending. Angel/Buffy fans couldn't get the "I love you", since Spike/Buffy had been building up to that for three seasons, so the next best thing he could give them was a kiss. (And yes, the whole scene did come off clunky and unnatural as a result, something that has even been pointed out by Angel/Buffy fans.)

Feb 18 2008 12:58 am   #42Eowyn315
The reason I don't like the Angel/Buffy reunion in Chosen, is because not only was it very out of character for both, but it felt like the writer's were chickening out of Spuffy. Never before after they had broken up, with the exception of I Will Remember You, had they greeted with a kiss.
Also, I think part of it was to create tension of "will Spike succumb to the First?" If Buffy and Angel hadn't kissed, there wouldn't be much for the First to stir up Spike's jealousy and inferiority. Honestly, it seems pretty silly to think that at that point, Spike might actually STILL be evil, but they seem to keep trying to suggest it so that they can go "nope, it's not what you think!"

I don't see him bringing back Oz for a Willow/Oz reunion and there is a lot of the fandom that still ships them, so why do that with Buffy and Angel?
Because Buffy and Angel are the original ship. Their relationship is the bedrock on which the show was founded. It fundamentally shaped who Buffy is. Angel's soul set up an entire morality system in judging good and evil. And it presented the great tragic irony of a vampire in love with the slayer, allowing them to take the relationship to epic proportions and turn it into one of the biggest extended metaphors on the show.

Regardless of whether Buffy and Angel as people are right for each other or still have feelings for each other, the relationship on its own plays a significant role in the Buffy mythology, and completely disregarding "lip service" to the fans, I can see why Joss would want to bring the show back to the beginning in that sense, by showing the closure of the Buffy/Angel relationship. (That doesn't mean I think he did it well, but I can see why he felt he needed to do it.)
Writing should feel easy, like a monkey driving a speed boat.
Feb 18 2008 03:59 am   #43Scarlet Ibis
If Joss wants Buffy to end up with Xander to prove that the dork can get the girl or whatever cockamamy reason he can cook up, then let him. 

You know...Xander does get the girl--twice.  He gets Cordelia--the friggin' queen of the high school, and (even though she tries to kill him later) gets to have sex with the slayer.  Granted it's not Buffy, but two hot chicks out of three?  Seriously, what does he need to prove?  The geek got two girls, and only lost one because he was sneaking around one of the hot girl's back with (sorry, but it's true) a "dork" who happened to be his BFF.  But whatever.

I do agree--it felt like that kiss in "Chosen" was Joss kissing the ass of the Bangels.  I can understand the reunion.  I can understand a hug.  Or hey, even a kiss on the cheek.  But it felt like a cheap shot, and cheapened the "I love you" we get from Buffy later.  Not only that, but the cut scene in the basement as well.  I think if he had put something in there instead of freaking out about pissing off the Bangels (which are not nearly as a strong a force as the Spuffy's), and put some kind of moment in there instead of the "hey, let the audience decide" garbage, I would've been okay with it.  Furthermore, I know that Angel and Buffy were the building blocks, but I thought Buffy was about maturing and moving on (especially since the series was ending)--that kiss was a total unjustified regression in which I did not understand.
"Just when the caterpillar thought the world was over, it became a butterfly."
https://www.facebook.com/FangirlNovel
Feb 18 2008 10:17 am   #44Enisy
You know...Xander does get the girl--twice.  He gets Cordelia--the friggin' queen of the high school, and (even though she tries to kill him later) gets to have sex with the slayer.  Granted it's not Buffy, but two hot chicks out of three?  Seriously, what does he need to prove?  The geek got two girls, and only lost one because he was sneaking around one of the hot girl's back with (sorry, but it's true) a "dork" who happened to be his BFF.  But whatever.

Joss himself said something to that effect...

Joss Whedon: That was fluid. The concept [of Xander/Buffy] was in the air and they both sort of got pulled in different directions storywise and we didn't feel like there was some big point we weren’t paying off, so we ended up not doing it. We liked him with Anya, and she had a lot going on, and it didn’t really seem to be the thing. The concept was out there, but it was never a mission statement. A lot of concepts were out there, then you sort of wait and see. Besides, Xander got so much goddamn tail. I’m sorry -- that's a nerd? He went out with Cordelia, he had an affair with Willow, he lost his virginity to Faith. He nearly married Anya. The guy’s James fucking Bond over here. It's a lie! It's a lie!

Feb 18 2008 10:29 am   #45Darth Rosenberg
Hey! Xander gets Anya too! Never forget Anya.

That Joss quote? Best freaking quote of all time!
Spuffies are a force not to be reckoned with. Bangels are doormatty fourteen year olds. Joss just wanted to push our buttons, even out the Angel vs Spike playing field. Angel gets a kiss, Spike gets I love you, Bangels and Spuffies alike are satisfied. And then, let there be scathing fan fic.
Feb 18 2008 05:40 pm   #46SpikeHot
That Joss quote is fantastic!

I agree with Immortal Beloved, many fans are starving for new canon, which is why I'm reading Season Eight and After the Fall. If Buffy hooks up with someone new, we can break them up in fiction. New drama, new storylines, new characters, more material to work with for writers.
Feb 18 2008 06:10 pm   #47nmcil
I think he just wanted to give something to both of the two main 'ships, since the show was ending. Angel/Buffy fans couldn't get the "I love you", since Spike/Buffy had been building up to that for three seasons, so the next best thing he could give them was a kiss. (And yes, the whole scene did come off clunky and unnatural as a result, something that has even been pointed out by Angel/Buffy fans.)

If you know your classic literature and know the metaphors - Buffy does love Spike - Cassie/Cassandra is the seer and speaker of truth, but she is cursed to never be believed.
Plus their intertwined hands, which Buffy initiated,  is also a symbol of coming together.  Their last scene together, IMO, shows them being joined as partners and equals; both magnificent people/heroes -

In some ways, that stupid kissing scene in Chosen makes her choosing Spike even more significant - it helps to establish that as past life - and their following scene in the cemetery and the cookie speech does give a tribute to the earlier seasons plus an effective way to satisfy to viewers who became invested in that relationship.  Once again though, if you know the mythic formulae, her "are you twelve" plainly shows that this relationship is one of past childhood and a not so good symbols of Angel and his state of mind -

As Eowyn315 states, Buffy-Angel was the foundation and continued to be the motivation for the entire series - giving recognition to that relationship, I think was appropriate.  I do think it was not especially well done, and I think that it brought back just a tiny bit Buffy's vulnerability to Angel but the cemetery scene also clearly shows that Buffy is on the path of growth. 
” Recent evolutionary models have demonstrated what politicians have long known: the best way to get people to collaborate and to think like a group is to identify an enemy and charge that “they” threaten “us.”

Michael Tomasello is co-director of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.
Feb 19 2008 02:28 am   #48Eowyn315
If Buffy hooks up with someone new, we can break them up in fiction.

Very good point, which is why I can't really understand all the vitriol that's directed at Joss and the comics for raising the mere possibility of Buffy hooking up with someone else. Does the great tragic Buffy/Angel romance stop us from writing s1-3 Spuffy fics? I haven't seen any shortage of s4-5 "Buffy dumps Riley for Spike" fics, either. What difference has it ever made to fanfic writers who Buffy was actually with? (Or anyone else for that matter - some of the most popular pairings are completely non-canon).

Regardless of whether Buffy and Spike are soul mates or "made for each other" or "will never love anyone else as much as they loved each other," the truth is that people don't end up with their soul mates all the time. Shit happens, lovers are kept apart or they break apart, and they move on. Maybe they won't ever love anyone else as much as they loved each other, but it doesn't mean they won't love at all, ever again. So, while keeping Spike and Buffy apart may not be satisfying to shippers, to me it smacks of realism - and Joss has always gone for tragic over happily ever after, so it's exactly what I'd expect.
Writing should feel easy, like a monkey driving a speed boat.
Feb 19 2008 03:20 am   #49Immortal Beloved
the truth is that people don't end up with their soul mates all the time

That's true; however, if they don't end up with their perfect match all of the time, that means that, sometimes, they actually do :-)  I don't believe in soul mates strictly in the romantic sense.  I think that a soul mate could be a friend or a relative or even a pet, just someone with whom you feel a powerful connection, someone who sees into your soul and knows you better than you know yourself.  By that definition, I believe that Spike and Buffy are soul mates.  The fact that he had no soul and then won one for her is a just the funny ha-ha frosting on the top.  They both hurt so much that it would be nice to see them bring eachother happiness.  It is possible, even if Joss doesn't think it is :-P

Seeing Spike with someone else usually bothers the crap out of me.  Don't ask me why--it just does.  As for Buffy, I was tickled pink when it was revealed that Rome Buffy was a decoy and Real Buffy was not boinking the Immortal.  It doesn't usually bother me to see Buffy with someone besides Spike.  She was usually with someone else in canon, so it doesn't seem weird.  But I know that I couldn't watch a Bander train wreck, even for the rubberneck value.  I might have to stop reading, just for my own personal feelings and nothing to do with Joss making it canon.  When something happens in a story that's too much for me to handle, I usually take a break.  Sometimes it's a brief one just to come to grips with the loss of a favorite character, etc.  Other times, it's a bit longer, like when Nick died in "The Stand."  I put the book down for 5 years before I could keep reading :-P  So, I guess I could continue to read the comics if Bander rears it's ugly head, but I might need a break to grasp the (fictional) reality of it
all...Five years should do it ;-)
Give me Spuffy, or give me death.
Feb 19 2008 04:58 am   #50nmcil
I would totally hate, nor do I expect any romantic Buffy-Xander relationship -  And if it comes about, I would not understand it.  Of course, I never understood that whole "Xander you are my heart," outside of it being another tribute to the series character.  Especially now that I have gone back to the earlier season 1-3, I am reminded why I mostly dislike the character - he is one of the most flawed characters in the series.  When Xander is good, he is loyal and brave and will jump right into the fight - but he is also such a selfish young man that so needed to grow up plus he could be out right vicious and dangerous in his anger and rage.  If he is ever hooked up with Buffy, I would seriously question what the entire series was about - To reward Xander after all the shit that he did in the series would be something that I would have a very very hard time in accepting and understanding.   And it's not because I think that Buffy belongs to Spike, it is primarily that I think Xander was never made to own up to the very bad things he did in the series.

With the comics, if one is looking to apply any potential foreshadows, the one thing that stands out to me is the image of a painting of the queen presented while Buffy is sleeping and that an oriental person is the one that awoke her - love comes in many forms and love also can pass from the worldly romantic plain into the mystical, spiritual, and intellectual - And just on a gut level, I think this is one of the factor that may be explored in comic season 8 - Buffy still has lessons to be learned.

I would continue to buy the comics, but I would be reading, while turning red, if Xander ends up with Buffy - don't expect it, but I would hate it.  Still, it's the work of Mr. Joss Whedon and as has been stated, he can do whatever he wants with it -
 
” Recent evolutionary models have demonstrated what politicians have long known: the best way to get people to collaborate and to think like a group is to identify an enemy and charge that “they” threaten “us.”

Michael Tomasello is co-director of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.
Feb 19 2008 12:01 pm   #51SpikeHot

But, nmcil, with the way you're talking about Xander you sound just like a Bangel who says, how can Buffy be with an asshole like Spike who tried to kill her more than once. That Bangel fan could be watching the high school years when Spike was evil, and gets reminded of his bad qualities.

If you wanna judge the relationship between Buffy and Xander, you shoud watch season seven, where Xander became a changed man. More supportive, grown up, quiet, rarely lets go of his anger. That's a Xander I can see Buffy fall for, if she ever did. And Xander's growth continues in season eight, never thought he'd actually stay behind and not follow Buffy to save Willow. He knows he's not strong enough, that's why he tells Buffy to choose one of her slayers. That's more maturity from Xander.

We wish that Bangel fans can see how much Spike had changed over the years, why don't we do the same with Xander and other characters?

Feb 20 2008 12:12 am   #52Eowyn315
if they don't end up with their perfect match all of the time, that means that, sometimes, they actually do
Yeah, yeah, yeah. :-P The thing is, though, that Buffy is very emotionally immature - Spike is her first "adult" relationship, and it's pretty much a total fuck-up (no pun intended). I really don't expect her to be finding her soul mate (or whatever you want to call it - person she's going to spend the rest of her life with) at her age. Much as I enjoy the Buffy-and-Spike-4eva fics, I really don't see Buffy settling down with one person at this point. Dumb as the metaphor is, she was right about the cookie dough - she still has a lot of growing to do. Spike's still alive, and as far as I know, Brian Lynch has no plans to kill him, so there's always the chance they'll come back around to each other eventually. But I'd feel it was out of character if she didn't move on (especially if she still thinks he's dead) and do some maturing and learning in other relationships first.

I think maybe the bottom line is that I have different expectations from canon and from fanfic. What I expect from canon is for the story to service the characters, not my ship. I can read all the Spuffy I want in fanfic, but if I had to pick the one path I thought was most likely and make it canon, for this point in Buffy's life, I really can't see her declaring her love forever for one person - even Spike.
Writing should feel easy, like a monkey driving a speed boat.
Feb 20 2008 12:22 am   #53Quark
Especially now that I have gone back to the earlier season 1-3, I am reminded why I mostly dislike the character - he is one of the most flawed characters in the series. When Xander is good, he is loyal and brave and will jump right into the fight - but he is also such a selfish young man that so needed to grow up plus he could be out right vicious and dangerous in his anger and rage.

I have a hard time seeing him any more flawed than any of the other core characters.  In fact, he's the only character that didn't directly kill anyone other than Dawn or Tara.  Summoning Sweet aside, he never crossed that line with his own hands (Buffy-Ted, Willow-Warren, Giles-Ben, Angelus-Jenny, etc).  Sure, he was selfish, but so was Willow, Buffy, Giles, etc.  Sure, he was cruel, but so was  Willow, etc.  He had some serious blind spots in his personal philosophy, but he wasn't the only one.  Willow displayed serious control issues time and again consistently throughout the series.  Buffy displayed a remarkable amount of self involvement and inability to accept shades of gray.  Each character was flawed but I don't think any of them had flaws that outweighed the others.  They tended to balance each other out.

~ Q
Feb 20 2008 01:41 am   #54Guest
I really don't expect her to be finding her soul mate (or whatever you want to call it - person she's going to spend the rest of her life with) at her age. Much as I enjoy the Buffy-and-Spike-4eva fics, I really don't see Buffy settling down with one person at this point. Dumb as the metaphor is, she was right about the cookie dough - she still has a lot of growing to do. Spike's still alive, and as far as I know, Brian Lynch has no plans to kill him, so there's always the chance they'll come back around to each other eventually. But I'd feel it was out of character if she didn't move on (especially if she still thinks he's dead) and do some maturing and learning in other relationships first.

How old would Buffy be at this point?  We don't know the exact time frame for Season 8, but she turned 22 in Season 7.  So, she's likely 22-23.  I will agree that Buffy has some growing in the emotional maturity area.  However, I do think that it is only possible to grow while in a relationship with a person (meaning any kind of relationship, not necessarily a long-term one), and that one will grow faster and more if in a relationship with the right person, the proverbial "One," if you will.  I met my husband when I was 22 and we discussed marriage in under two months.  I'll admit that I was more mature than the average 22-year-old, but it isn't completely unheard of to find your match at that age.  Hell, I know people who met theirs even earlier than that.  I'd never had a serious boyfriend, but I met him and knew I'd marry him on our first date.  He says the same about me. 

...Okay, that was rambling.  The point: It's completely possible for Buffy to get baked at her age.  She may have the relationship skills of a 7-year-old boy, but it's amazing how fast you grow when you meet your match.   Just look at the difference between Season 5 or 6 Buffy and Season 7 Buffy.  She changed a great deal once she stopped being depressed and Spike stopped being crazy :-P

I have a hard time seeing him any more flawed than any of the other core characters.

I don't think Xander's any more flawed than the rest of the characters, but one of Xander's flaws is one of my biggest dislikes in a person, fictional or otherwise: he's judgemental.  That may not seem like a big thing to some people, but I abhor it.  I try to be a very non-judgy person, mostly because I hate to be judged, and I would never hold anyone to standards that I, myself, am not willing to meet; and, even then, I try not to judge.  Xander was very judgy of Buffy and her romantic choices.  Granted, she made some pretty craptastic decisions, but he wasn't exactly a relationship guru himself.  Instead of supporting her and trying to help her to learn from her mistakes--like a good friend would--he judged her.  Xander made some of the same mistakes that Buffy did and some that she didn't.  He had no room to be critical of Buffy, and that's why I like the character a hell of lot less than I did when I first started watching.

Feb 20 2008 02:09 am   #55Scarlet Ibis
one of Xander's flaws is one of my biggest dislikes in a person, fictional or otherwise: he's judgemental. 

Very true.  However, it doesn't last.  After "Selfless," he grows up some.  Xander has a total bias of vampires specifically--he's okay with Oz, lesbianism, wiccanism, and ex-demon status.  Losing his best friend to dying and becoming a vampire, and losing the girl he loved (at the time) to a vampire who later goes on a killing rampage doesn't help.  I too don't like Xander's prejudice, but it's such a narrow margin considering (although, in "Afterlife," that line to Spike was way retarded, and frankly, OoC considering the time frame and who the hell wrote that ep exactly), I can pretty much let it slide.  Especially because we see him change in s7 on screen.  It's subtle, but I think Nic Brendan did a good job with it.
"Just when the caterpillar thought the world was over, it became a butterfly."
https://www.facebook.com/FangirlNovel
Feb 20 2008 08:46 pm   #56nmcil

Reason that I disliked Xander so very much was this is issue of "judgemental and hypocrisy" -  While Xander does mellow and mature, I don't believe that he is a strong enough person for Buffy, even in Season Seven - he goes along with the let's get a new leader - What are the reasons for that, is it because he was so badly injured?  Did his maturity and changes far short of understanding the life of a warrior and that battles will always bring death and destruction with them?  The Xander that I would  respect  is the Xander that would have followed up on his Buffy Is The Bestest General You Could Have speech with real action of support -  Or a Xander that would have been the leader, the first to speak up in the discussion of tactics and what condition Buffy was to continue as the general. 

All the characters have many flaws, but Xander, IMO, really could be vicious against those whom he felt deep resent against - his part in the Acathla cycle, his attempted killing of Spike, his backlash against Buffy in Selfless when he insist that Anya Vengeance Demon not be slain - in complete contrast and denial of his Angel is a Killer-you just want your boyfriend back. 

Hey - all these characters are totally flawed and screwed up - why they hell did I even watch the series, of yeah, reflection of myself.  Frankly, the only two Scoobies that I really admired were Tara and Oz. I liked Willow and Cordelia I loved for complete acceptance of her self - greedy, selfish, self-centered and I like me this way - you don't like what you see, go elsewhere.

I like the Xander of Comic Season 8 thus far he does seem a lot more mature and being in this new phase of The Buffyverse gives us all an opportunity to have new connections and perceptions of this characters - I frankly would loved to be able to find a new understanding and respect for Xander, let both of us grow.  But from the series, Xander still had a lot of garbage baggage and he would have been better served with well crafted thoughtful scene of deep felt contrition and acknowledgement of some of his worst conduct with Buffy instead of that kitchen scene before he takes Dawn away.

I know that I am especially hard on Xander, but since I always viewed The Buffyverse as metaphor and commentary on our Real World social structures, Xander personified some of the worst dynamics in our society.  Sorry to offend anyone with my Xander dislike - but then I LOVED Andrew and how many viewers totally hated him.

” Recent evolutionary models have demonstrated what politicians have long known: the best way to get people to collaborate and to think like a group is to identify an enemy and charge that “they” threaten “us.”

Michael Tomasello is co-director of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.
Feb 20 2008 10:35 pm   #57SpikeHot
While Xander does mellow and mature, I don't believe that he is a strong enough person for Buffy, even in Season Seven - he goes along with the let's get a new leader -

Funnily in the end, Xander seemed the only one -other than Spike- that Buffy completely trusted, if we count the kitchen scene and the hand squeeze/ eye staring in Chosen, as well as asigning Xander to fight along side with Dawn instead of better fighters like Wood and Giles.

While I didn't like that Xander didn't side with Buffy in Empty Places, I understand his reaction better than all the others. Buffy wanted to repeat the same plan in Dirty Girls, that plan caused Xander his eye, his reaction is only natural. Besides, Xander was never someone to follow Buffy blindly, if he didn't like what's she's saying, he'd tell her so. I find that a good thing, though maybe it'll be better if phrased better. 

I liked that he didn't complain when Buffy didn't want to spend time with him in the hospital, he knew she had more important things to do, and was more understanding, unlike Willow who looked disappointed.

I think Xander stepped a long way in maturity in season seven, and it's continuing in season eight.
Feb 21 2008 02:25 am   #58Immortal Beloved
Very true. However, it doesn't last. After "Selfless," he grows up some. Xander has a total bias of vampires specifically--he's okay with Oz, lesbianism, wiccanism, and ex-demon status. Losing his best friend to dying and becoming a vampire, and losing the girl he loved (at the time) to a vampire who later goes on a killing rampage doesn't help.

I understand why Xander had a prejudice against vampires, but that's not what bothers me.  What bothers me is his judging of Buffy regarding her relationship with vampires.  He doesn't like vamps, and that's understandable given his experiences.  However, he claims to be Buffy's best friend and treats her like crap when her own views of said vamps don't match his own.  He even ties to sabotage Willow's ensouling in "Becoming II" by out right lying to Buffy about Willow's message in order to bend the outcome of the fight to his will.  Friends don't have to support or agree with your every move, but Xander had no right to treat Buffy the way he did when he himself lived in a glass house.  Yes, he does change his tune after "Selfless."  He seems to finally understand that you can't help who you love, even if they eat people or kill frat boys.  Only when he saw the world through Buffy's eyes did he try to understand, but by that time, I had already lost faith in him.  I know that there was only so much that they could cram into the episodes; but, if he had acknowledge his quick-to-judginess to Buffy as nmcil said,  I might have been able to start liking him again.  But they didn't put it in, so I was left with a bitter taste in my mouth. 

I LOVED Andrew and how many viewers totally hated him.

You are not alone--I freaking love Andrew.  He cracks me up :-)
Give me Spuffy, or give me death.
Feb 21 2008 03:10 am   #59Scarlet Ibis
To be fair to Xander...he was only 17 in "Becoming 1 & 2," and his best friend was put in a coma because of a vamp raid for one vampire who wanted to destroy the world.  And frankly, if he had told Buffy that Willow was working on the soul spell, Buffy may not have pushed herself as hard.  She was in it to win it, but I think that if she believed that Angel may return, it could have ultimately gotten her killed.  I do agree with the whole glass house thing, but that doesn't really count until season four, and even then, Xander really just sees Anya as a human.  It isn't until "Selfless" that he realized that Anya made a choice to be evil, whereas Spike (and Angel) did not.  And he does let Spike live with him.  I don't care how good of friends he was with Buffy--he didn't have to do that.  He did not have to open his home to the guy who diddled his ex-fiance.   Forget that Spike's a vamp--he screwed the woman Xander loved. Granted she was his ex by then, but hey, who's going to be filled with happies after seeing that--ex or not?  I know I woulndn't, and I certainly wouldn't part my threshold for some chick who I saw have sex with my ex who I still have feelings for.  And only to learn she was also doing my BFF before that.

And I love Andrew too.  He totally screwed up, killing his best friend and all, but Tom Lenk makes me laugh :P
"Just when the caterpillar thought the world was over, it became a butterfly."
https://www.facebook.com/FangirlNovel
Feb 21 2008 09:31 am   #60SpikeHot
I agree with Scarlet.

I also love Andrew.
Feb 21 2008 06:02 pm   #61nmcil
I think Xander stepped a long way in maturity in season seven, and it's continuing in season eight.

You make great points on Xander - I submit that I do not give enough credit for his changed character and his perspective in Empty Places, of course he is concerned that the same scenario will end in the same results - Plus I tend to see Xander as his very good qualities being over shadowed by his equally bad character traits - which is totally a bad thing, both in real life and in critical analysis - thanks to all for the much needed reality check

This stepping away from childhood and into the world of self made adult, after all, is what the series was founded on - we all need the reminders to THINK about how and why you see the world as we do.
” Recent evolutionary models have demonstrated what politicians have long known: the best way to get people to collaborate and to think like a group is to identify an enemy and charge that “they” threaten “us.”

Michael Tomasello is co-director of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.
Feb 24 2008 11:03 am   #62Guest
I actually found a Bangel fan today that believes that the only people who are Spuffy's or Briley's are the people who started watching the show after all the seasons were done.
Feb 24 2008 11:09 pm   #63Guest

I actually found a Bangel fan today that believes that the only people who are Spuffy's or Briley's are the people who started watching the show after all the seasons were done.

That's definitely not true. I watched from the first episode on because I had a thing for ASH from when he was on VR5.Not to mention he was playing a male British librarian, which was very kink hitting.


I did tend to channel flip more during the earlier seasons (and I missed an eppy or two) because the Bangel scenes made me cringe and that was long before I heard I even heard of Spuffy .

I hated how quickly she climbed into bed with Parker and how needy she acted the next day instead of going off on him. Even if she didn't go all Slayer on him she still could've made him beg for mercy without doing permanant damage.I chalk up her behavior to Angel damage because Angel never fixed any of the damage he did the morning after they slept together.

There's was even less chemistry with Briley then there was with Bangel (And I didn't think that was possible until I saw it). Buffy didn't seem to be interested at all in him . Willow's hard sell of Riley seemed a little too hard if there was any chemistry there. It also seemed like she talked herself into the relationship possibly because he was approved by one of her friends.

The sexfest episode could be held up as the best example of the lack of chemistry in Briley. I actually turned off the tv when they started having sex and then turned it back on occassionally to check if the disaster was over. That was the least titilating sex scene I have ever seen in my life.

The commercial for AYW  annoyed the heck out of me even before I saw the episode because it referred to Riley as the man she loved plus it showed her almost kissing him. My first reaction on seeing it was " I thought we were done with this!" Watching it didn't improve matters. Buffy seemed to simper around Riley even after she found out he was married. Not to mention you have to question the intelligence of a woman who blindly believes the word of a guy who  cheated on her at a low point in her life (sick mother, hellgod) and then blamed her for the betrayal. Then gave her the ultimatum to forgive him or else even though it was his fault and he had already made plans to leave. Not to mention he had gotten over her quickly, didn't tell her he was married(his wife did that) anf apparantly hooked up with someother black ops type unit.

She does all this and doesn't even try to listen to Spike who stayed and protected her sister and her friends after she died (unlike Angel who went to a monastery and left his friends in the lurch) . And who had definitely earned the benefit of the doubt unlike Riley.

 

ladycat713
 

Feb 25 2008 09:40 pm   #64nmcil
I did tend to channel flip more during the earlier seasons (and I missed an eppy or two) because the Bangel scenes made me cringe and that was long before I heard I even heard of Spuffy .

Even after all this time, and especially with going back at watching Seasons 1 thru 3 again, I still have a really hard time watching this relationship.   Sure, Buffy learned some really tough lessons about life, but Bangel was the proverbial two-sided sword, made her stronger as The Slayer, but also made her so weak - She finally starts to get her Woman Strength back after in Graduation but then the writers put her right back into the crazy-times of Briley.  Was there even a love scene or scene where affection is shown that did not come over as "Girl in Imagined Love" mode - 

 
” Recent evolutionary models have demonstrated what politicians have long known: the best way to get people to collaborate and to think like a group is to identify an enemy and charge that “they” threaten “us.”

Michael Tomasello is co-director of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.
Feb 26 2008 12:33 am   #65Guest
Sure, Buffy learned some really tough lessons about life, but Bangel was the proverbial two-sided sword, made her stronger as The Slayer, but also made her so weak

I always saw Buffy's long attachment to the Bangel relationship as desperation rather than true love. It was a teenage relationship that would've petered out if it weren't for the body count. Buffy had to build him up as the love of her life to justify the deaths he caused after losing his soul. No small part of that is Buffy's unnecessary guilt over his losing his soul.If she had anything to feel guilty about after the soul losing , it would be not killing him when she had the chance at the mall when the whole thing with the Judge went down. But even that could be seen as part of her guilt over his losing his soul.She blamed herself , so she couldn't kill him for it. Plus since the whole , the demon and man are two completely different entities had already been stated and accepted by her, in her mind killing Angelus could be seen as killing Angel (to her an innocent person).

But to me, he had years to at least show some curiousity about the curse and still did nothing.The burden of research was on him.Therefore the fault was his.

He also didn't give her a clean break of the relationship. His telling her she should have a normal life was monumentally stupid as well. He (unlike Joyce) had been around long enough to realize that Buffy was never going to have a normal life. Joyce was just trying to not lose her daughter to death again and had no experience of the supernatural.Not to mention she could have said that in order to get rid of a major threat to her daughter's heart and health.

ladycat713
Feb 26 2008 09:04 am   #66Guest
Has anyone here every read an essy on Bangel, out of curiosity's sake cause we are all Spuffy fans?
Feb 26 2008 10:57 am   #67nmcil
Spike in "Lovers Walk" is the signal for the final breakdown of Buffy-Angel-Lovers, from this point on with every new episode we see the decline, and even a transfer of position of strength.  Buffy begins to finally accept and be willing to move away from the relationship and Angel begins to need it more and more.   We go through "Enemies" to "The Prom" and that wonderful and important scene where Joyce finally has that "mothers talk" to Angel.  Then with "Graduation 1" Faith, as did Spike, brings in new dynamics.  Angel-Buffy-Forever turns deadly, both in moral choices, life paths, even their very lives.  Xander's harsh words of "when the chips were down" (sorry for the paraphrase) perfectly reflect how destructive this relationship became - the sexuality and the feeding off Buffy depicted with their fall onto the floor, Angel on top, was so effective; the perfect metaphor.  But A metaphor of so many layers, the life-death cycle , Buffy as the "Creative Mother Goddess,"  Angel as a male Kali, and in the end Angel's dangerous feeding, and Buffy's offer of self as sacrifice, forces the final and vital rite of passage for both of them.  Angel can no longer deny that his need and love is in reality the kiss of death for her.  His question of  why he was brought back is finally going to be answered, he can now attempt the conversion to The Champion in LA.

It is still a big mystery to me why anyone would think that Buffy-Angel-Forever was ever possible, why it was ever, other than harsh and vital lessons on life, a good force in Buffy's life - all the metaphors, written and visual, never supported the theme, IMVHO, of this as a Lifetime Love and Romance - this was a tale of Heroine moving through the rites of passage on the road to Becoming A World Hero/Heroine.  A very flawed warrior/heroine, but a woman having to find her inner strength to go with her destiny as A Slayer.

Thought it a ironic connection  that The Mayor, like  buffy and Angel is also entangled in the emotional currents of love - the thing that finally kills him is his love of Faith -
Can't say I much cared for the easy out Joss Whedon  took in the Dreamscape scene with  Buffy and Faith  -  let Buffy the heroine have a positive ending with Faith instead of the brutal stabbing scene.  The scene brings the Slayer Spirits together and connected, even if Buffy only subconsciously connects with Faith, it still gives a positive spin to their deadly duel.  I was surprised at how little commentary was given to the stabbing scene, considering how important and interesting the issues surrounding that act speak to Buffy's conduct as The Slayer.
” Recent evolutionary models have demonstrated what politicians have long known: the best way to get people to collaborate and to think like a group is to identify an enemy and charge that “they” threaten “us.”

Michael Tomasello is co-director of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.
Feb 26 2008 11:07 am   #68nmcil
I always saw Buffy's long attachment to the Bangel relationship as desperation rather than true love.

Why do you suppose that Buffy is depicted as such an insecure and desperate young woman and lover in this relationship and with Riley as well?  Angel and Riley both were rather boring and obviously not good partners for Buffy - Were they meant to be the counterparts of Buffy's subconscious, which is how they made sense to me. 
” Recent evolutionary models have demonstrated what politicians have long known: the best way to get people to collaborate and to think like a group is to identify an enemy and charge that “they” threaten “us.”

Michael Tomasello is co-director of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.
Feb 26 2008 02:44 pm   #69Scarlet Ibis
But to me, he had years to at least show some curiousity about the curse and still did nothing.The burden of research was on him.Therefore the fault was his.

The only ones with the cure or the means to break the spell were the ones who cursed him, so I'm sure he did some research, so he could be rid of the soul and return to Darla, but came up fruitless.

He also didn't give her a clean break of the relationship. His telling her she should have a normal life was monumentally stupid as well. He (unlike Joyce) had been around long enough to realize that Buffy was never going to have a normal life.

But he also calls it a freakshow--he tries to be an asshole so she can hurt a lot, but get over it quicker.  Didn't exactly work out that way, but he figured it was a shot (although, saying that condemned her to unfortunate events of mediocrity in the relationship department, but whatever).  If he told her "No, it's not you, it's me," it would've seemed phony.  I think the best thing he could have said would have been something along the lines of that it wasn't working for him--that he needed a chance to find out who he really was independtly away from her, and away from PTB messengers like Whistler.  I mean, he did have a ton of growing up to do anyway.  All of that "I don't eat--I don't breathe," etc. was him forcing himself into an unecessary box.  He was pretty much alone in Sunnydale beyond Buffy--no friends,  and pretty much no fun in life.  Angel didn't have any fun the whole three years he was there (cept that one time he laughed with Cordelia.  Did he ever laugh, or smile really big beyond that one scene?  I honestly don't recall...)

Why do you suppose that Buffy is depicted as such an insecure and desperate young woman and lover in this relationship and with Riley as well?  Angel and Riley both were rather boring and obviously not good partners for Buffy - Were they meant to be the counterparts of Buffy's subconscious, which is how they made sense to me. 

In s4, she came off to me as one of those women you see who's just desperate to have a boyfriend, and accept the first guy their good intentioned but incredibly wrong friend throws at them, and stay in the dead end relationship cause at least then, they're not alone.  It's sad, and icky to watch.  I didn't think Angel was boring--I just thought he was annoying with Buffy.  Riley was incredibly annoying, however, and actually was as dull as a table lamp.  He was, as my mother would say, beige.  Bland.  No color, no life, no vibrancy. He epitomized boring.  And no, just cause he was trained with the military and wore fatigues does not make him cool.  He was on a mission, could fight, and was obscenely tall for Buffy.  I think the writers and whoever cast him thought he'd be an adequate replacement for Angel, which was the wrong way to start him off in the first place.  Angel can't be replaced, and if one were to try, you'd end up with a really terrible outcome.  It should have been someone completely different and opposite of Angel and Buffy's doom and gloom sometimes demeanor.  Insert Spike, or hey, if you want to stick with  humans, Forrest had flare, and doesn't seem like the type to take shit from anyone.  And again, a Bander relationship would have made sense at this point in time.  He was the only one she could really lean on--count on in the first ep of the season.  He knows were really well, and hey, he's a good looking guy who already knows of her alter ego "Cemetery Gal."  Plenty of options, but we got stuck with Riley... le sigh.

And I've said it once (somewhere), but I'll say it one more time--Parker looked like Xander on drugs, and appeared even lamer with his skinny, geeky frame (unlike the nicely shaped Xander at the time).  I don't care if he was in college--it wasn't like he was a scholar or something.  They should have just had her be with Xander as opposed to some lame who kinda looked like him, and was essentially a sex hungry (who probably wasn't even any good at it from all of the experience he'd had with young freshmen, gullible girls) loser.  I think what pisses me off most about him is that he looked like Xander, and if you can be sexually attracted to someone who resembles your best friend, but looks like the brokedown version, why not just date the best friend?
"Just when the caterpillar thought the world was over, it became a butterfly."
https://www.facebook.com/FangirlNovel
Feb 27 2008 01:44 am   #70Eowyn315
I think the best thing he could have said would have been something along the lines of that it wasn't working for him--that he needed a chance to find out who he really was independtly away from her, and away from PTB messengers like Whistler.
That might have been the gentlest way to end things, but it wasn't the truth. He wasn't really looking for a chance to find out who he was, or to have fun and make friends apart from her - he seemed to be slipping back into his pre-Buffy isolation before Doyle came along. And he wasn't trying to discover himself apart from people like Whistler. It was actually a PTB messenger who gave him his post-Buffy sense of purpose, and it was the companionship of Doyle and Cordelia, and later Wesley, that forced him to make something of himself beyond Buffy.

I think Angel really honestly believed what he told Buffy - he left her for her own good. She deserved better than he could give her, and he didn't want to be bringing her down. I think he really does see himself as a bit of a freak show, and as much as he loved Buffy, he saw his relationship with her as somewhat perverse because of his own vampirism.

I think the writers and whoever cast him thought he'd be an adequate replacement for Angel, which was the wrong way to start him off in the first place. Angel can't be replaced, and if one were to try, you'd end up with a really terrible outcome.
Well, it depends on what they were going for. Maybe the intent was for us to see Buffy as having a type, so she chooses a guy physically similar to Angel. I don't think we were supposed to look at Riley and think he doesn't measure up to Angel, but in the long run, given how their relationship turned out, it really does make sense from the perspective of Buffy's character development. She was looking for a replacement for Angel, and he didn't measure up, because no one will measure up to the first love.

They should have just had her be with Xander as opposed to some lame who kinda looked like him, and was essentially a sex hungry (who probably wasn't even any good at it from all of the experience he'd had with young freshmen, gullible girls) loser.
The problem you'd have there is that when Buffy and Xander inevitably broke up, it would rupture the core of the Scoobies. I think it would be hard for them to go back to just friends if they had dated at that point - especially with Buffy still hurting over Angel, it would be so messy, and I can picture it ending with Xander getting terribly hurt. They really needed a throwaway guy like Parker - someone Buffy (and the audience) could rebound off of and happily despise afterwards. Why they chose someone who looked so much like Xander, I think they probably just went with the best actor and didn't think too much about the similarities. I think if they were going pair Buffy with Xander, they should have used him instead of Riley, not Parker - but again, what happens when they break up?
Writing should feel easy, like a monkey driving a speed boat.
Feb 27 2008 02:00 am   #71Scarlet Ibis
so she chooses a guy physically similar to Angel.

Not really--he pursues her, through Willow, and Willow, who's still wallowing, forces Riley in her direction.  Sure it's her ultimate decision to go along with it...but she wasn't interested in him in that way inititially.

I think if they were going pair Buffy with Xander, they should have used him instead of Riley, not Parker - but again, what happens when they break up?

Various awkward moments, a touch of slapstick comedy, and a few moments of that look  when you pretend to not look directly at the person--sideward glances, you know, and then it's back to business.  There was plenty going on in Sunnydale to bring them together as a team.  And then of course, it all depends on when they would have actually broken up.  Either way, they could have come through it all right. Just because you break up doesn't necessarily mean it's a bad, messy one that involves one party leaving the city or the country, or calling of names, or whores of any kind :P
"Just when the caterpillar thought the world was over, it became a butterfly."
https://www.facebook.com/FangirlNovel
Feb 27 2008 08:14 pm   #72nmcil
Another thing with a potential Xander-Buffy romantic relationship is that Xander was used as a speaker of truths and a speaker of things that were to come in the future, he and Cordelia both almost take on the part of a The Chorus in a Greek Drama. 

Do you think that the majority of viewers would have accepted this relationship after all their history?  Also, how do you counter-act Xander's very strong dislike and intolerance with demons and buffy's duties as a Slayer - sometimes she has to accept demons as allies, plus you would introduce Xander as the character who lied to Buffy in a critical moment as purely from his own agenda during the Acatha cycle. 
” Recent evolutionary models have demonstrated what politicians have long known: the best way to get people to collaborate and to think like a group is to identify an enemy and charge that “they” threaten “us.”

Michael Tomasello is co-director of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.
Feb 28 2008 12:18 am   #73Quark
plus you would introduce Xander as the character who lied to Buffy in a critical moment as purely from his own agenda during the Acatha cycle.

I don't think that was a personal agenda at all.  Buffy had hesitated with Angelus for months.  The world was on the line, not just them anymore.  He had terrorized them, killed one of their own and was planning to end the world.  Any hesitation wouldn't have just meant Buffy's death - she would have taken the world with her.  His decision not to tell Buffy about Willow's efforts might not have been the good thing to do, but it was the right thing to do from a strategic standpoint.  I don't believe there was any residual Buffy-crush behind that decision.  He had moved on and was in love with Cordelia, despite the protests and ribbing he got from the girls.  His best friend was in the hospital, his only adult role model was being tortured, the monster that Buffy had had the chance to kill more than once was behind it all so he made the decision to remove any doubts she had about finally ending it.  It might have been a distasteful decision but it was the right one and not necessarily motivated by some ridiculously inappropriate lingering infatuation in the middle of an apocalypse.

~ Q
Feb 28 2008 03:53 am   #74Immortal Beloved
It might have been a distasteful decision but it was the right one and not necessarily motivated by some ridiculously inappropriate lingering infatuation in the middle of an apocalypse.

It wasn't necessarily a personal agenda, but it was a blatant lie.  If Xander wanted to cheer Buffy on so that she'd have the strength to kill Angel, he didn't have to mention Willow at all.  He could have just told Buffy to kick Angel's ass himself instead of putting words into Willow's mouth.  He had started telling Buffy what Willow said, hesitated, and made a conscious decision to lie.  Unfortunately, Buffy had no time to realize that Willow--the one who supported Angel's ensouling, the one who didn't judge Buffy for her relationship with him--would not likely send that particular message.  It seemed to leave an impression on Buffy, as year's later, she confronts Willow with it when they're arguing about killing Anya in "Selfless."  Willow appeared to take offense at Xander's lie: "I never said that."  He had every right to tell Buffy what he himself thought, but he had no right to twist or change what Willow said. 
Give me Spuffy, or give me death.
Feb 28 2008 03:59 am   #75Eowyn315
Just because you break up doesn't necessarily mean it's a bad, messy one that involves one party leaving the city or the country, or calling of names, or whores of any kind :P
Uh... with Buffy it seems to... lol.

He had started telling Buffy what Willow said, hesitated, and made a conscious decision to lie.
I think he did that because he started to tell her the truth, and then realized that it wasn't what she needed to hear. She was gung-ho going into battle, and Xander knew she needed to stay that way, or even to get pumped up more - hearing about the re-souling spell would only have made her hesitate and not go at it full force. And let's be honest, Angelus came very close to killing her well before Willow completed the spell. If Buffy had been consciously fighting only just hard enough to keep him busy until the spell could work, she'd probably be dead and the world would've been sucked into hell. It was the drive, the determination to fight to the death that kept her going and helped her win.
Writing should feel easy, like a monkey driving a speed boat.
Feb 28 2008 07:24 am   #76nmcil
He had started telling Buffy what Willow said, hesitated, and made a conscious decision to lie.

What is so confusing about Xander and his excellent and horrible character faults is very much at play in this instance - Excellent point, Buffy did not in anyway need to be distracted or other than fully focused on her fight against Angelus, it was a fight to the death, so the decision to not tell her that Willow was trying to en-soul Angel again was strategically correct, but his using Willow's name to deliver that message and with very particular anger I do think presents the scene as Xander motivated from his personal hatred of Angelus and his wanting to not have Buffy distracted by the possibility that Angelus could revert to Angel.

At any rate, Buffy's test, as mentioned by Whistler, was exactly how she would perform at the absolute point of truth - will she kill Angel and do her duty as The Protector Slayer/Warrior/Hero?  The script is wonderful, it brought in all the drama and the history, via Xander as the reminder of deaths caused by Angelus, plus it placed Angel back into the position of the human quality.  Easy to kill Angelus, to kill Angel is the ultimate test.

I am going through the entire series again, and Xander for all his advice to Buffy and his talk of Love and relationships, he really does not know himself at all - He had every reason to hate Angel/Angelus, and he totally speak his mind, and IMO, makes excellent point when he tells Buffy that Angel's killing of Jenny Calendar is to be put aside so that she can have her boy friend back - In my opinion that is just what Buffy wants - I know everyone will have their own interpretation of that powerful scene. 

Then we have Xander in "Triangle" - another great Xander at his best - he literally throws himself into the battle with  Olaf - there is not hesitation or concern of his own safety he is all about trying to save Anya and Willow - hell he even takes what should have been a death blow to his head from that troll hammer.  In "Into the Woods" we have Xander convince buffy that Riley is the answer to all her love life misery, yet Riley is totally the wrong man for her.  To end the episode we have Xander and Anya in their I Will Always Love you and Be There For You - combined with Anya prophetic "if you ever decide to leave me, give me a sign."  Xander is truly a character that we can love and have intense dislike for, depending on the episode. 

On another subject - I just realized tonight that buffy wears the same coat and sweater in her Good-Bye scene with Riley and the Alley scene in "Dead Things" - The writers did a superb job with the episode titles - "Into the Woods" is one of the mythic symbols for danger and the journey into the underworld.  The transition from Breaking Riley's heart and killing their relationship of "Into the Woods" makes a great pair with "Dead Things" 
” Recent evolutionary models have demonstrated what politicians have long known: the best way to get people to collaborate and to think like a group is to identify an enemy and charge that “they” threaten “us.”

Michael Tomasello is co-director of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.
Feb 28 2008 09:20 am   #77Quark
It wasn't necessarily a personal agenda, but it was a blatant lie.

Right.  Exactly.  Lying wasn't a good thing to do in that moment, but it was the right thing.  Eowyn stated it best above, so I won't rehash that post.  Simply put, I don't think it was so much putting words into Willow's mouth as that he realized he was about to give Buffy a reason to hold back, hesitate and stopped himself by feeding her a lie instead.  Kendra died because Buffy was hanging desperately onto the idea that she could get Angel back and left her friends with an unseasoned slayer for protection while she went to stall Angelus, falling right into his trap.  I think Xander's decision in that moment might seem insignificant but it was pivotal.  As far as I'm concerned it was him mirroring his actions from the finale of season one - he got Buffy breathing, helped her stand strong and march into the battle.  His s2 finale words had a similar affect on Buffy when they could have done the opposite if he had instead chose to let Buffy know about the spell.  Telling the truth could have very likely ended the world.
~ Q
Feb 28 2008 02:54 pm   #78Legen
i'm all for spuffy, mostly just because, spike never lied to her. he told her how it was, whether she wanted to her it or not. angel always pussy footed around her and as much as i was totally into their 'ship before spike, they still grated my cheese. even more so after they broke up, because he WAS a huge ass about it, as well as, he changed. when ever she was around he was a differnt person. whether he was lurking on btvs, or she was on ats. that's what pissed me off the most. if you can't be the same person at all times reguardless of who's around, then that person is definitely not the one for you. which is why i don't think xander could work, becuase he changes his tune to mcuh with his she's good he's bad bs. his double standards just...arg. i mean i agree he has his moments, but he just killed me sometimes. i agree that buffy was very emotionally immature, but i think that with the growth that she seems to have made in the comic versions of season 8, as well as the growth that spike made in ats, they could work out. he's no longer got her on this "your so great and can do no wrong" pedistal. i don't know though.
Your heart will break, your tears will fall, but don't be suprised, if there is someone there, to catch you when you fall. Becuase you, yes you, are awesome.
Feb 28 2008 11:39 pm   #79nmcil
I offer my apologies to Xander with my original comments on his part in the Becoming  Part 2  - while he did lie to Buffy, after watching the episode again, I realize that he did tell Buffy a lie with his without holding information about Willow trying the spell again.  I was wrong to ascribe that action  being motivated from his extreme anger with Angel/Angelus.  I was primarily remembering his first reaction to the spell being attempted again and how really angry he was with the entire idea.  When he meets up with her again, just before she  has to fight Angel, his tone is completely different.  So, Hey Xander, sorry for my bad thoughts.  Boy, did I fall right into the "seeing what you want mode" on this one -  So glad that the comments made me go back to watch again - thanks all, I really don't want to become a character basher.

Another good thing about going back to Becoming was that I got a chance to see Buffy's clothes again.  This is now three times that she wears browns and black when she has her pivotal moments with the men in her life - with Riley and Spike she wears the same coat and sweater, with Angel she wears black top and brown variation of slacks, but she also starts out by wearing a coat cut in the similar style only in blue.
” Recent evolutionary models have demonstrated what politicians have long known: the best way to get people to collaborate and to think like a group is to identify an enemy and charge that “they” threaten “us.”

Michael Tomasello is co-director of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.
Feb 28 2008 11:45 pm   #80nmcil
I love that moment in Angel Season 5, think the episode is "Shells" but not sure, when he answers Angel that he will stick around to help - at first he mumbles to himself something like "it's what she would want" and then he realizes that it is actually what Spike wants aside from anyone else - He, the vamp/man is now fully realized as a hero working and standing on his own.  It was such a quiet scene and moment, but so filled with meaning.
” Recent evolutionary models have demonstrated what politicians have long known: the best way to get people to collaborate and to think like a group is to identify an enemy and charge that “they” threaten “us.”

Michael Tomasello is co-director of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.
Feb 29 2008 03:06 am   #81Indigo Stevens
Oh Good Lord, I read every comment on here and I do need to say this: I am a Bangel fan.

I'm also a Spuffy fan though too, so no-one get their knickers in a knot.

Its because I love both ships that I can probably have the most neutral and honest POV because Im not for or against either of them.

The honest to goodness truth of the matter is this: neither Spike nor Angel were good to Buffy or good for Buffy. Both relationships were very complicated and seriously flawed.

Yes, Joss did the Bangel kiss in Chosen. He wasn't doing anyone any favours. He was simply being true to the characters. Buffy and Angel were and are always going to be the most important relationships that the two of them ever had or will have simply for these reasons: First Love.

Angel had never ever been in love before and neither had Buffy.

There isn't a one of you that does not remember your first love, and if it was a relationship that ended for reasons other than falling out of love, then chances are, you still have a soft spot for your first. Granted, you've probably grown up and fallen in and out of love numerous times since, but that star-crossed lovers type of relationship? Always remembered with a fondness and a soft spot.

Angel and Buffy didn't break up because they didn't love each other anymore. They loved each other an incredible amount but it was the fact that they felt that Angel could not give Buffy what she needed/what she'd eventually want/need which caused Angel to walk away. Angel ended things with Buffy because he loved her enough to let her try to find the life that she deserved and that he couldn't give her. Buffy never had the chance to have a grown-up relationship with Angel, so she never was able to get beyond the "What If" so Angel is always going to be that fairytale Romeo & Juliet type of love.

With Spike, he tried numerous times to kill her. He hated her and wanted her dead and supported those that could & wanted to kill her when he was chipped. It wasn't until Season 5 that we started seeing some changes in Spike for the better and it wasn't until that disastrous Season 6 (or close to the end of Season 5) that we saw Spike finally being motivated by something that wasn't mostly self-serving. With Spike, he finally fell in love with someone that was more equal to him than Dru. He chose his own path--granted, it was to follow after Buffy and take her abuse, but he chose to allow those things. For Buffy, it was the chance to also learn how to make her own decisions. It was a disastrous, co-dependent, toxic relationship, but it finally brought very pertinent issues to the fore; issues that needed to be dealth with before either of them could ever have a chance at any kind of healthy relationship with each other or anyone else for that matter--it finally made them both realize that they each had some serious growing up to do. They both needed to learn how to stand on their own before they could rely on each other. They both had to take a good hard look in the mirror and fix their own POVs before they were able to finally see the potential of themselves and each other. The kiss Spike witnessed between Buffy and Angel? The old Spike would have turned her over to The First. All it did was emphasize how far Spike had come from where he started.

And yeah, that kiss was very much realistic. All the hurts and stresses and angst Buffy had to deal with not only for herself, but with everyone else leaning on her as well, everyone wanting something from her; fighting a preacher that kicked her ass several times; trying to figure out how to fight something that couldn't be touched but that could amass an army of Bringers to kill young girls and a legion of uber-vamps that could very possibly take over the world AS well as all of the various relationship angsts going on between everyone and then along comes someone who isn't asking anything of her or putting any undue stress on her or trying to hurt her in any way and who also happens to be someone she at one point was very much in love with and still loves??

Yeah. I'd have kissed him too.

Buffy still loves Angel, even there at the very end, when it was Spike she said those three little words to. Buffy is always going to love Angel. Always.

But there is a big difference between loving someone and being in love with someone and THAT is the point Joss was making with the Bangel kiss and the flaming Spuffy confession. Buffy loves Angel, but she eventually fell in love with Spike.

Joss left us all dangling but that was the point. Otherwise how in the hell was he supposed to sell his comic books when he finally had the free time to write them? He said all along he never planned on leaving things as they ended--that he had the comic book idea floating about his head for a long time, but 7 years of writing and producing for 2 shows, but writing and setting up for other shows...it takes its toll on a body and the cast of Buffy had reached a point where they were ok with letting it go so they did. Joss finished up with Angel and went to his other projects and finally had free time to tie up his loose ends with Buffy.



Passion. It lies in all of us. Sleeping... ...waiting... And though unwanted... ...unbidden... it will stir...open its jaws, and howl. It speaks to us... guides us... Passion rules us all. And we obey. What other choice do we have? Passion is the source of our finest moments. The joy of love... the clarity of hatred... and the ecstasy of grief. It hurts sometimes more than we can bear. If we could live without passion, maybe we'd know some kind of peace. But we would be hollow. Empty rooms, shuttered and dank... Without passion, we'd be truly dead ~Angelus, BtVS Season 2, Passion episode
Feb 29 2008 04:32 am   #82Eowyn315
I think Xander's decision in that moment might seem insignificant but it was pivotal. As far as I'm concerned it was him mirroring his actions from the finale of season one - he got Buffy breathing, helped her stand strong and march into the battle.
That's a really interesting observation. I never made that connection, but when you say it like that, I can see the parallels.

Angel had never ever been in love before
I would disagree there. It may feel that way, since we saw Angel and Buffy first, but I think the intensity of Angel's feelings for Darla that we see in AtS indicate that he loved her first. (Not to mention the "Buffy was a rebound after Darla" that's implied in "Guise Will Be Guise." )
Writing should feel easy, like a monkey driving a speed boat.
Feb 29 2008 04:41 am   #83Legen
i think that angel lost his appeal after we got a taste of angelus. angel was all doom and gloom, and that's sexy, for a minute, but after awhile you just get tired of it. evil as he may have been, angelus was awesome. he was snarky and fun. bringing out angelus, only to turn him back into angel, was angel's biggest down fall.
Your heart will break, your tears will fall, but don't be suprised, if there is someone there, to catch you when you fall. Becuase you, yes you, are awesome.
Feb 29 2008 06:04 am   #84Indigo Stevens
I would disagree there. It may feel that way, since we saw Angel and Buffy first, but I think the intensity of Angel's feelings for Darla that we see in AtS indicate that he loved her first. (Not to mention the "Buffy was a rebound after Darla" that's implied in "Guise Will Be Guise." )

Nah. Just like Spike and Dru, it wasnt so much love as it was the Sire/Child bond I think. He spent hundreds of years with her exploring every hedonistic pleasure possible. Hard not to have residual feelings. I do think Angel loved Darla--is the same way Buffy ended up loving him at the end. He might have loved her, but I don't think he was in love with her.



Passion. It lies in all of us. Sleeping... ...waiting... And though unwanted... ...unbidden... it will stir...open its jaws, and howl. It speaks to us... guides us... Passion rules us all. And we obey. What other choice do we have? Passion is the source of our finest moments. The joy of love... the clarity of hatred... and the ecstasy of grief. It hurts sometimes more than we can bear. If we could live without passion, maybe we'd know some kind of peace. But we would be hollow. Empty rooms, shuttered and dank... Without passion, we'd be truly dead ~Angelus, BtVS Season 2, Passion episode
Feb 29 2008 06:37 am   #85Scarlet Ibis

neither Spike nor Angel were good to Buffy or good for Buffy. 

Buh?  Okay, maybe the not good for, but not good to?  I'd have to disagree there.  Also, yes it's true that Spike changes because of love, but his biggest changes occur while Buffy's dead.  So technically, he did take his own path (pre Buffy's second resurrection--then it becomes way skewed).

As for Angel, he definitely loved and was in love with Darla.  The first seven years or so they're together, Darla is offered to stay at the right hand of the Master, her maker, who she'd been with for a hundred and fifty years, whereas Angelus was only around for seven.  She chooses Angelus.  If there was a bond, her bond with the Master, her maker, would outweigh hers with Angelus twenty times over.  She also tries to ditch him (only to save herself from Holtz) within those first twenty years.  And she does.  He seeks her out.  And Spike did fall in love with Dru--a love that surpasses childe/sire loyalty, or whatever you want to call it, as did Angelus and Darla.  They've all made others (the young couple Darla and Angelus used to hange with pre-Drusilla come to mind, though I don't know their names), but they didn't stick around, nor did Angelus and Darla seek them out.  But the four of them were a family, and not in a "pack" kind of sense.

"Just when the caterpillar thought the world was over, it became a butterfly."
https://www.facebook.com/FangirlNovel
Feb 29 2008 09:55 am   #86nmcil
I must be really old and cynical because I can see very little good that came from this Great Love that was Buffy and Angel - It put Buffy on the path to becoming the great slayer heroine, and from my perspective of interpretation, this relationship was exactly as it needed to be.  It was great story telling and SMG gave it such a grand quality of Heart, Love and Passion.   Even with the wonderful writing, I think that her interpretation of the role was a  huge factor in many viewers falling in love with the Buffy-Angel love affair.   When I try to see this relationship outside of the metaphor, I think it was a very bad place for this character to experience. 

With the Spike-Buffy relationship, as horrible as it was for both of them, it was also the making of the man.  Just as the ordeals that Buffy experienced with Angel/Angelus, she takes Spike into the same dark places that Angel took her.  Just as Buffy emerges as The Slayer Heroine, after Angel and Riley, she gives the same empowerment to Spike.  They go through hell on earth together, but they both eventually resurrect as warriors for light. 

As much as Buffy loathed Spike, and hated the idea that she could want him throughout their tragic sixth season.  I actually am glad  that she did not want him or love him, because all that love and passion he feels, and yes obsession in his early stages of desire, ultimately goes into the self-created man/vamp  transformation in Africa.   Buffy, in the big picture view, was very good for Spike and made him learn how to transform all his capacity to love into a positive force in his life.  The Spike at Wolfram & Hart  has found his own inner hero, and for all the ugly and badtimes with Buffy, she had a big part of making that all happen.  

I'm not at all sure how bad Spike was for Buffy - it seems that Buffy could take him or leave him at her will.  The attempted rape was such a horrible experience, and I am in no way trying to justify Spike's action - it was horrible for both of them.  But again, in the big picture, it resulted in Spike getting his soul/humanity back.  I not sure Spike played the usual role of enabler - it was a very complex relationship.  It seemed that Buffy simply did whatever she wanted with him, but not as an obsession as physical abuser, nor did she appear to understand at all how much she affected his psyche.  When she claims that their relationship is killing her, my impression was that she operated from a very self-centered position.  I am not trying to be critical, or placing blame on her, simply making an observation - it's  like she did not seem to understand that she was also killing Spike.  Buffy was truly his fire of creation.

I also do think that Angel/Angelus loved Darla - Not in the same way that he loved Buffy, but I do think he cared for her.  Vampires do love, as Drusilla tells us, and Spike clearly shows us and Angelus tries to wash away;  their expressions of love may not be the same as human form, but it still exist.


I am so excited to see where Joss Whedon is going to take the Buffy and all those slayers in season 8 and what will happen to Angel and all his realm in their comic season. 
” Recent evolutionary models have demonstrated what politicians have long known: the best way to get people to collaborate and to think like a group is to identify an enemy and charge that “they” threaten “us.”

Michael Tomasello is co-director of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.
Feb 29 2008 03:27 pm   #87Indigo Stevens
But just as I said, there is a difference between loving someone and being in love with someone. Just as Darla chose Angelus over the Master in the beginning, it wasn't always so. Darla ran off numerous times to be with her Sire. I think Darla more or less chose Angelus in the beginning because he was still new to her. Her new plaything/toy whereas her relationship with the Master was more or less a Boss/Employee type deal with minimal affection on his part, hence why she'd always go running when he'd come calling.

Spike was bad for Buffy because he was manipulative and self-serving. He knew she couldn't have a relationship, was in no condition to even be in one but his obsession fuels his persistence and her pursues her anyway. He lied and schemed repeatedly until his infatuation actually turned to love with her, and even then he still lied lied and schemed.

Yeah, granted he was changing and couldn't go perfect overnight--but he was fully aware of what he was doing and how negatively it would affect Buffy or their 'relationship' should she find out--case in point, ep As You Were, with the demon eggs in his lower level.

Buffy and Spike were very destructive towards themselves and each other, but it needed to happen because otherwise, they might not have been able to get to the point that they did in the flamey hand-holding scene in Chosen.



Passion. It lies in all of us. Sleeping... ...waiting... And though unwanted... ...unbidden... it will stir...open its jaws, and howl. It speaks to us... guides us... Passion rules us all. And we obey. What other choice do we have? Passion is the source of our finest moments. The joy of love... the clarity of hatred... and the ecstasy of grief. It hurts sometimes more than we can bear. If we could live without passion, maybe we'd know some kind of peace. But we would be hollow. Empty rooms, shuttered and dank... Without passion, we'd be truly dead ~Angelus, BtVS Season 2, Passion episode
Feb 29 2008 05:21 pm   #88Guest
I have to disagree with the manipulative and self-serving. Spike wanted to help Buffy through most of their relationship in season six, but he didn't exactly go about it in the best ways. Manipulative, yes he can be, but so can Buffy.
Feb 29 2008 07:03 pm   #89nmcil
Yeah, granted he was changing and couldn't go perfect overnight--but he was fully aware of what he was doing and how negatively it would affect Buffy or their 'relationship' should she find out--case in point, ep As You Were, with the demon eggs in his lower level.

I don't think that Spike did fully understand how much Buffy could be hurt emotionally, he still had a big transformation journey.  Case in point - "Into The Woods" - the way JM interpreted that episode was wonderful - it clearly, IMO, shows that Spike did not understand how vulnerable her emotional state was with regards to Riley and male relationships.  The scene just as the leave the vamp bloodhouse shows Spike as surprised at how hurt and distressed Buffy became - at least this is what I saw in that scene and the following scene from that experience shows him even practicing to try and explain himself to her, plus his own frustration and anger with himself, which he directs toward the dummy - and again, once his outburst is past, he goes back to his practice candy box speech.  Compare this incident to "Intervention"  and you will see his continued transformation. 

Totally agree with "it needed to happen"  so that "let's go be heroes"  becomes their reality instead of the sexual underworld. 

On the "As You Were" episode, that was, in my opinion, all about Love and Fantasies and  needing to destroy past history and make new paths to travel.
” Recent evolutionary models have demonstrated what politicians have long known: the best way to get people to collaborate and to think like a group is to identify an enemy and charge that “they” threaten “us.”

Michael Tomasello is co-director of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.
Feb 29 2008 10:53 pm   #90Scarlet Ibis
Spike was bad for Buffy because he was manipulative and self-serving. He knew she couldn't have a relationship, was in no condition to even be in one but his obsession fuels his persistence and her pursues her anyway. He lied and schemed repeatedly until his infatuation actually turned to love with her, and even then he still lied lied and schemed.

Um...no.  "Manipulative and self-serving" describes Buffy in season six, not Spike.  He did not pursue her in that way.  He's there to help, which is good and fine until no one has control over their emotions, and suddenly burst into song.  Granted, he tells her to let him "rest in peace," because she only comes around when she needs help, knowing full well that he's still in love with her (and the whole "I can be alone with you here" comment really made me pissed off), but he still comes to help--Dawn's been kidnapped, and her friends seem to think she can do it better on her own (or if you want to be technical, Giles does, but no one pipes up to disagree except for Spike).  And then, when she attempts to commit suicide via dancing to death, Spike is the only one to save her, when she is in a room filled to the brim with friends and family, who were just going to let her burn.  Then, when he walks away, she runs after him--calls him back.  Some days past, and she's emotionally traumized from getting her memories back after Willow's spell, he tries to talk to her, and she turns her back on him.  So he storms off.  The next instance we see them, they're kissing.  This means that Buffy had to get her ass off that stool and go after him--again.  I am not going to devle into the sex, and how she was the one who initiated, and the rest of season sex, or "As You Were," cause there are other threads for that, and in those threads are rebuttals to the comment about Spike's alleged demon eggs (alleged in the sense that they actually belonged to him).
"Just when the caterpillar thought the world was over, it became a butterfly."
https://www.facebook.com/FangirlNovel
Feb 29 2008 11:35 pm   #91Eowyn315
Just like Spike and Dru, it wasnt so much love as it was the Sire/Child bond I think.
Er, disagreeing more now. I don't see how you could say Spike and Dru was just a sire/child bond. Spike obviously loved Dru, and even though Dru may be "fickle," I think she loved Spike as well. And I don't think your assessment of Angel and Darla is accurate, either. I think it goes much deeper than "exploring every hedonistic pleasure possible." If that's all it was, why stick with the same person for a hundred years, especially after some of the fights they had? Why not ditch the other person and turn someone new to "explore" with, add some variety to unlife? The fact that they go through so much and always end up coming back to each other indicates that there's much more holding them together than a simple sire/child bond. As Scarlet pointed out, there are half a dozen "children" that come and go during the time they're together, including Spike and Dru, and yet none of them stayed with Darla and Angelus as long as the two of them stayed with each other. Also, the fact that Angel is still so hung up on Darla even after he has the soul indicates it's not just about hedonistic pleasure. At that point, he wouldn't want hedonism, but he still wants Darla. There's definitely more there than just fucking around.
Writing should feel easy, like a monkey driving a speed boat.
Mar 01 2008 01:06 am   #92Darth Rosenberg
There's no question of Spike and Dru and Angel and Darla loving each other. It's more a question of how much. Spike clearly loved Dru more that she loved him, and I think Angel loved Darla more that she loved him. In a way, they were both love's bitches to those two. Always coming when they called, always getting back together after a fight - the Scourge were a family, and a family choc full o' love.
Mar 01 2008 01:22 am   #93nmcil
I think that one need only go to AtS to see how much Angel/Angelus cared for Darla - his dreams with her and how hard he tried to save her, even offering his own life in exchange for hers, I think are a testament to how deep his feelings were for her.  It was not until Angel slips back into a dark place that he turns on Darla and Dru both.  And even if the woman that he tried so desperately to save is not Darla Vampire, his only memories and connection with her are from his vampiric life, so it is the vampire that he shared a life with that he remembers.  Was he only working to save Darla because of guilt or from a deep connection to the woman?  I think he is motivated from feelings and not just from his sense of duty as The Champion.
” Recent evolutionary models have demonstrated what politicians have long known: the best way to get people to collaborate and to think like a group is to identify an enemy and charge that “they” threaten “us.”

Michael Tomasello is co-director of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.
Mar 01 2008 06:00 pm   #94Guest
There's a link on another site I got to that's got a bunch of Bangel quotes said by the cast and crew but since I really have no interest in it, I didn't bother clicking the link.

Anyway, it just seems to me that they try to insist that their's no possible way Angel or Buffy could ever fall in love with someone else, which is silly. I mean, I don't see people saying that Willow can't love Tara cause of Oz.
Mar 02 2008 04:15 am   #95Guest
There's no question of Spike and Dru and Angel and Darla loving each other.

Spike definitely loved Drusilla, no question.  I also believe that Drusilla loved Spike...as much as someone in her mental state can love another person.  Darla loved Angel ("God doesn't want you, but I still do"), but she definitely put herself before him repeatedly.  Angel also loved Darla.  Yeah, he did kill her to save Buffy, but that doesn't mean that he didn't love Darla when they were together.  After Darla was resurrected and made human again, Angel definitely showed that he loved her.  I do think his trying to save her to the extent of willingly sacrificing himself was partly in a futile attempt to save himself, to give Darla the chance at life that he so desires; but he does care for her greatly.

who also happens to be someone she at one point was very much in love with and still loves?? Yeah. I'd have kissed him too.

I wholeheartedly disagree.  There's no way that I would kiss my first love, second love, or maybe just a guy I used to crush on if I had spent the previous night in the arms of my current not-my-boyfriend-but-I-might-want-him-to-be-post-apocalypse beau.  If I were excited to see him, I might kiss him on the cheek, but definitely not full on the mouth, tongue or no tongue.  Doing so might ruin my chances making the not-my-boyfriend my actual boyfriend.  But, then again, I'm neither indecisive, nor fickle.
Mar 02 2008 04:17 am   #96Immortal Beloved
Crap :crap: The comment just above was me, IB; and, since I cannot edit it, please excuse the ;-)  I formatted the sentence incorrectly :-P
Give me Spuffy, or give me death.
Mar 02 2008 05:58 am   #97nmcil
There's a link on another site I got to that's got a bunch of Bangel quotes said by the cast and crew but since I really have no interest in it, I didn't bother clicking the link.

It would be interesting to read what the cast and crew said - if you can remember the site I would love to read the comments -

I have been watching some of the special feature comments and mostly find them not especially informative with regards to most of the themes I find interesting -  The one comment about Buffy stabbing Faith was very short, simply that this was a very dark place to take Buffy.  I guess these extra features are not meant for in depth discussions.
” Recent evolutionary models have demonstrated what politicians have long known: the best way to get people to collaborate and to think like a group is to identify an enemy and charge that “they” threaten “us.”

Michael Tomasello is co-director of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.
Mar 02 2008 11:26 am   #98Guest
No sorry. I don't remember it right now. But if I find it again I'll send it to you.
Mar 03 2008 02:20 am   #99nmcil
thanks anyway -
” Recent evolutionary models have demonstrated what politicians have long known: the best way to get people to collaborate and to think like a group is to identify an enemy and charge that “they” threaten “us.”

Michael Tomasello is co-director of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.
Mar 03 2008 01:13 pm   #100Enisy
Angel/Buffy quotes here. Spike/Buffy quotes here.

Mar 03 2008 02:37 pm   #101Legen
for a minute there reading some of the posts it reminded me of some of the main arguements buffy had for loving spike, and justifying loving angel. the whole, have a soul don't have a soul thing. 
Your heart will break, your tears will fall, but don't be suprised, if there is someone there, to catch you when you fall. Becuase you, yes you, are awesome.
Mar 03 2008 02:48 pm   #102Guest
I was arguing with a Bangel fan earlier that insists Spike doesn't love Buffy, he just thinks he does.
Mar 03 2008 02:55 pm   #103Sotia
I don't bother arguing with Bangels any more! My sis is one of them and refuses to listen to logic. Then again her main argument is that Angel is better for Buffy cuz he's hotter, and when I ask why she says that she insists it's cuz he's taller. Sadly I believe that the emotional maturity of the rest of the Bangels is at about the same level as hers.

I just pity them if they think love means making choices on behalf of the other person and disrespecting them by not paying heed to what they want.  

xxx
Sotia
What can I tell you, baby? I've always been bad...
Mar 03 2008 05:43 pm   #104Guest
I saw that today actually. One Bangel was saying that Angel loved Buffy more, her main argument was 'Spike has stupid hair'. And then they always insist the only reason Spuffy's are Spuffy's is because we think James Marsters is hot. Not that we don't, but that's not the reason we are.
Mar 03 2008 06:11 pm   #105nmcil
you could also remind Bangels that there were many viewers who had a great dislike for how JM was exploited as a sexual figure in many of the scenes - he was often shown with just barely covering drapes over his nude body, etc.  I am sure you all know what I mean.  And as much as I think James Marsters was extremely handsome as Spike, the "eye-candy" approach they often took with him, I personally found highly offensive and utterly stupid. 

On the Angel was "so hot" he actually was the least handsome male lead in the entire series - all of the major male leads were very handsome men or had a wonderful quality to their characters that made them beautiful - Oz and Giles both were extremely appealing and Spike, Xander and even on the AtS, the other male leads were very much more handsome than Angel, Gunn & Wesley, Lindsey were extremely handsome; much more than Angel in my opinion.  I personally never understood the idea presented that Angel was extraordinarily handsome.

” Recent evolutionary models have demonstrated what politicians have long known: the best way to get people to collaborate and to think like a group is to identify an enemy and charge that “they” threaten “us.”

Michael Tomasello is co-director of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.
Mar 03 2008 06:24 pm   #106Nika

'Beauty is in the eyes of the beholder.' Personally, I don't find DB all that good looking really, he's not my type. I don't think Xander's good looking either. Spike, Wesley, Gunn, Lindsay, even Giles I find handsome.

But DB, I don't find him handsome enough to have the saying 'face of an angel'. His forehead is large, his nose is to broad, and his face has no range of expressions. James might be aging, but I still think he's better looking than DB.

But I also don't think SMG is really that pretty. I know a lot of people do, but honestly I think Alyson Hanngan is prettier than her, and Charisma Carpenter. But that's just me.

And James actually said he tried to put on some weight in season seven so the writer's would stop making him take his shirt off. That didn't work out that well, because he's got his shirt off just as much in season seven as previous seasons.

"Perhaps a great love is never returned."

-Dag Hammersjold
Mar 03 2008 08:46 pm   #107Guest
I watched BTVS from day one but I didn't discover the WB Bronze Forum until right after OMWF.  I was totally astounded by the 'Spike and Spuffy' hate.  Little ole naive me getting introduced to vehement posting hate that can abound on forums.  I found the Bangels outrageously vocal about their ship and Spike hate and it did take a while for Spike fans and Spuffies to start posting their views.  I think over time that the Spufies are more vocal because they have wonderful arguments that are intelligent and reasonable.  IMHO Bangels stagnated into their first love 4eva rose colored galsses rut whereas most Spuffies looked at both ships, and the characters and welcomed the growth and evolution.  If Spike acted like as ass, then Spuffies acknowledged it.  Not so in the case of Angel and the Bangels.

I don't mean to offend (well, not too much), but I thought all Bangel arguments were incredibly superficial and you can't argue with someone who refuses to see life as only black and white.  I mean....Angel and Angelus were two different people???????  Give me a break!!  Don't you want the WHOLE man/vamp to love you?  That's like saying...'well, he loves me when he's on his meds and the homicidal maniac in him is under control.'  Spike managed to love Buffy as both demon and man.  It was a process but it happened.  And then the Bangels went all out in their Spike hatred after SR.  I don't think any Spuffy liked the AR but unlike Bangels, we saw how it affected Spike and sent him on the journey for his soul.  Yes, there is the AR but funny how the Bangels thought it was romantic when a 240 year old vamp took the innocent mind and body of a 17 year.  Besides the obvious statutory rape how can you condone an OLD older man taking advantage of a young girl like that?  (Was I the only one who thought that Joss and ME had their heads up their arses when writing those storylines for Buffy and Angel?) . 

I guess bottom line, I think Spuffies have always been more open-minded and fair and in the long run Spuffies are more vocal because there are more of us still around today.  I would love to see Spike and Buffy together one day in canon but I can still enjoy their separate journeys.  I have hope for Spuffy since Joss once referred to Spike as his 'Ulysses'.  Time will tell...and hopefully before I kick the bucket!

Regarding looks and actors.  I have never drooled or crushed on an actor unless I have been mesmerized by their acting skills.  I never thought DB was especially good looking and I still don't.  I don't consider him a good actor but he can be entertaining.  I was a goner for Spike and JM after CRUSH.  Granted, I thought he could act before this episode but I was absolutely floored by his acting in CRUSH.  He went from good looking to down right delicious to me.



 
Mar 03 2008 09:06 pm   #108Enisy
Ooo, where did Joss refer to Spike as his "Ulysses"? I haven't heard of that before.

Besides the obvious statutory rape how can you condone an OLD older man taking advantage of a young girl like that?  (Was I the only one who thought that Joss and ME had their heads up their arses when writing those storylines for Buffy and Angel?) .

I think it's very telling that they cut down on the Spike/Dawn interaction in Season 6 in fear of the 'shippy undertones -- and Dawn was the same age that Buffy had been when Angel allegedly fell in love with her. Took them a while, but they finally realized how squicky it is for centuries-old vampires to ogle 15-year-old girls.

Mar 03 2008 11:01 pm   #109Guest
I had all these lovely booksmarks with quotes and interviews on BTVS but my computer crashed.  The bookmarks were my ammo for the shipping wars  back when LOL.  The quote about Ulysses was from an interview that happened either late S5 or during early S6.  Here's hoping someone here remembers that interview and can post it.  All I can tell you is that Joss definitely said it!
Mar 03 2008 11:53 pm   #110nmcil
Here is a good article with Joss Whedon and Neil Gaiman in Time - use the next for advance

http://www.time.com/time/arts/article/0,8599,1109313-1,00.html
” Recent evolutionary models have demonstrated what politicians have long known: the best way to get people to collaborate and to think like a group is to identify an enemy and charge that “they” threaten “us.”

Michael Tomasello is co-director of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.
Mar 04 2008 12:47 am   #111Nika
Great article. I'd actually forgotten that Joss did Roseanne. That use to be my favorite sitcom. Maybe that helped with Glenn Quinn's casting as the part of Doyle, since he used to play Mark on that show.
"Perhaps a great love is never returned."

-Dag Hammersjold
Mar 04 2008 01:09 am   #112nmcil
Thanks much for the links - excellent

Angel/Buffy quotes here. Spike/Buffy quotes here.
” Recent evolutionary models have demonstrated what politicians have long known: the best way to get people to collaborate and to think like a group is to identify an enemy and charge that “they” threaten “us.”

Michael Tomasello is co-director of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.
Mar 05 2008 12:56 pm   #113Caro Mio
Well, Spike and Dawn being separated was because Marti Noxon thought Michelle maturing made Dawn and Spike alone in a room together *look* inappropriate because Spike wasn't related to Dawn. They never planned to write any attraction between them, she just thought it didn't look kosher. Duh, like they weren't so obviously brother/sister in their interaction!

I really think Joss thought it was okay for Buffy because she was a Slayer and that took her out of our normal rules with Angel. (And Angel had the relating maturity of a kid because he didn't know how to be human.)

If you want to see DB really shine, watch him on Bones. And I've always thought he had a fantastic smile. Lights up his whole face. Compare him on AtS to Bones, and he's actually a lot better actor than a lot of people think. I admire him as Angel more in retrospect now after seeing him as a different character for a while.
What If I'm Not the Slayer? now updated with chapters 22 and 23.
Mar 05 2008 02:41 pm   #114Legen

DB was a terrible actor in the begining of btvs. but it was his first big thing, so i guess it can be expected. from the begining of buffy to the and of angel, he came a huge way.  
And I've always thought he had a fantastic smile. Lights up his whole face
i totally agree. it was nice to get him out of buffy's world, just to see him smile. which he did a great deal  more of on ats.

Your heart will break, your tears will fall, but don't be suprised, if there is someone there, to catch you when you fall. Becuase you, yes you, are awesome.
Mar 05 2008 04:14 pm   #115Guest
Hell, it was practically his first acting role at all!
Mar 05 2008 05:20 pm   #116Nika
I think his imdb page says DB was discovered walking his dog, lol. James had done theater before that, so...
"Perhaps a great love is never returned."

-Dag Hammersjold
Mar 06 2008 02:15 am   #117nmcil
I think his imdb page says DB was discovered walking his dog, lol. James had done theater before that, so...

This is truth as stated in the quotes -
” Recent evolutionary models have demonstrated what politicians have long known: the best way to get people to collaborate and to think like a group is to identify an enemy and charge that “they” threaten “us.”

Michael Tomasello is co-director of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.
Mar 08 2008 07:41 am   #118Guest
I have found that arguing with a Bangel is like arguing with a brick wall. They throw quotes around that the writer's and cast said about Bangel, but if you give one about Spuffy back to them, like the one about Joss saying that Buffy was in love with Spike, they brush that off. If you're going to take one, you should take the others!

Then, despite what the writer's say about Spike loving Buffy and getting his soul back for her, they insist on saying he doesn't and he went to get the chip out. It's a complete double standard.
Mar 08 2008 02:21 pm   #119Enisy
It's not just the writers who say that Spike got his soul back for Buffy -- the onscreen canon does, in Lessons, Beneath You, Sleeper, Never Leave Me, and Get It Done.

Mar 12 2008 05:24 am   #120Guest
Has rewatching the early seasons episode with Bangel made you like it or dislike it anymore than you did before?
Mar 12 2008 05:30 am   #121nmcil
I find that I dislike Bangel even more now - especially seeing the episodes again for our discussions and having all the later season, fan fictions, and analysis from other sources -
” Recent evolutionary models have demonstrated what politicians have long known: the best way to get people to collaborate and to think like a group is to identify an enemy and charge that “they” threaten “us.”

Michael Tomasello is co-director of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.
Mar 27 2008 03:33 am   #122Guest
I've been getting more and more annoyed lately when I see the Bangel shippers going in and posting stuff on the Spuffy forums on other sites. I don't recall any Spuffy fans being that disrespectful.